Nowadays the increasing number of garbage is a real concern
It is convienced that recently, the rising amount of rubbish is not only a story, it occured in our environment and become a crucial problem. In this essay, I would examine the reason behind it and how we could face its matter.
In the one hand, there are several causes for increasing the percentage of garbage. Firstly, many people are using items that it could not be decomposed easily so this activity make an accumulation of trash in nature. For instance, in a big city, citizens produce lots of houshold waste in every single day and the highest amount reached by plastic. It is not be an unusual knowledge that the plactic is only could be recycling by a spesific method so the existence in our life would decrease. Secondly, inhabitants are not used to using things that could be used for many times. It is because they buy disposable goods in their daily activities. For the model, when the woman want to buy something in store such as shampoos or foods they did not bring tote bags so the store give them a huge plastic to bring all of the stuff. Thus, it could create the number of rubbish is increasing in this period of time.
Nevertheless, to tackle this problem, the government could provide a method which is suitable for decomposing the garbage from plactic or others that made from the same materials. As proof, in several development countries, there are existing a way to create new product from this kind of rubbish so it could manage the number of trash in surroundings. In addition, the country must make a few advertisement for using the bag for carrying the goods when the citizens have to buy it in the grocery stores. For example, lots of countries in the world have made ads in their nations about the replacement of plastics to bags because it could save our world and reducing the problem of trash.
To sum up where my track, decreasing the percentage of garbage needs cooperation between citizens and governments so it could gain the maximum result that make the environmental problems could be better in the next decade.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-24 | Trần Ánh Vy | 89 | view |
| 2024-07-04 | MEBC Class | 80 | view |
| 2024-05-21 | nguyen thanh sang | 73 | view |
| 2024-02-02 | MinyiChu | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-18 | Nina Tsarevich | 78 | view |
- The Pie chart gives information about the country of birth of people living in Australia 78
- There have been major advances in technology over recent decades and this has led to significant improvement in people s lives To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children s charity located in the USA spent and received in one year 11
- Nowadays the increasing number of garbage is a real concern 11
- The charts above representate the number of output and utilization grease in China from 1982 to 2006 It is measured in million barrels per day 100
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 360, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...st amount reached by plastic. It is not be an unusual knowledge that the plactic i...
^^
Line 2, column 810, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...store give them a huge plastic to bring all of the stuff. Thus, it could create the number...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 894, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...number of rubbish is increasing in this period of time. Nevertheless, to tackle this problem,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 390, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun advertisement seems to be countable; consider using: 'few advertisements'.
Suggestion: few advertisements
...s. In addition, the country must make a few advertisement for using the bag for carrying the good...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, for instance, in addition, kind of, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1696.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68508287293 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61470764552 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519337016575 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4263751091 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.066666667 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1333333333 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0591753236835 0.244688304435 24% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0250877073525 0.084324248473 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0437079735166 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0333129084411 0.151304729494 22% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0195898521654 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.