The line graph shows visits to and from the UK from 1979 to 1999, and the bar graph shows the most popular countries visited by UK residents in 1999.
The line graph provides information about the overseas and domestic tourism volume in the UK over a period of 20 years whereas the bar chart shows Britishs’ preference for different tourist attractions.
Generally, from 1799 to 1999, although both witnessed growth, it is evident that more English travel to other countries than overseas residents coming to theirs for a holiday.
Additionally, Spain and France are the two most visited nations by UK residents as they significantly surpassed others in terms of visits.
Firstly, in 1799, the visit to and from the UK was similar, at around 10 million. In the following years, the figure for trips made by foreigners increased steadily with only 1-million-growth in three years. In contrast, that of the British skyrocketed to reach its peak at around 54 million visits in 1999, which is nearly two times higher than that of overseas residents.
Regarding the foreign destinations of UK visitors, France was the most popular choice for the British in 1999 with about 11 million travellers, followed by Spain with under 10 million visits. However, the number for the USA was equal to only a third of Spain, at nearly 3 million. Finally, compared to other tourist places, Turkey and Greece were the least common choice as under 3 million UK residents visited these countries.
- The chart graph shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different types of attractions from 1980 to 2010 73
- Global warming is one of the most serious issues that the world is facing today What are the causes of global warming and what measures can governments and individuals take to tackle the issue 89
- Some people think that the increasing use of computers and mobile phones for communication has a negative effect on young people s reading and writing skills To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The diagram below shows the floor plan of a public library 20 years ago and how it looks now 11
- Some people think that being able to communicate with others online is breaking down geographical barriers and enabling people who would normally never have the chance to meet to communicate What are the advantages of international communication online Ar 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, however, if, regarding, third, whereas, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1120.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1376146789 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77364804445 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605504587156 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 320.4 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3937411116 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.444444444 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2222222222 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.44444444444 5.23603664747 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292554591315 0.215688989381 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111145624619 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0671353143664 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150041719588 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0181042509525 0.0819641961636 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.