Progress should be the aim of any great society. People too often cling unnecessarily to obsolete ways of thinking and acting because they enjoy feeling comfortable and fear the unknown.
Scientific discoveries have revolutionized how we view our society and world. For centuries, people have believed that the Earth was the center of the universe or that the Earth was flat, but scientists have proven both theories to be myths. Progress is crucial in our society because it could improve our lives. However, many new improvements in society are controversial, such as GMOs and cloning, and scientists are still exploring the adverse effects of these technologies. Therefore, new changes in society should be studied and revolutionary technologies should be welcomed but treated with caution.
Societies preserve traditions because ancestors have used their experience to infer eternal truths from their lives. Despite the variety of processed foods available, conventional wisdom still reminds consumers that natural, organic foods are optimal for health. Agricultural corporations have created GMOs to create more food and obtain a larger yield, but the adverse effects of GMOs remain a mystery because some effects may not appear for decades or even for centuries. Although GMOs do produce more crops for farmers, they should still be treated with caution because more research is required to fully comprehend their benefits and risks, and using them without fully understanding them could pose a health risk for generations to come.
Cloning is another controversial technology. Although clones could potentially save lives by “growing” new organs for terminally-ill patients, such practices have moral and ethical concerns. Some movies have explored the possibility of growing clones for people and have debated whether the value of the cloned person was inferior to the original person. Technologies like cloning can solve problems in the modern society, but these technologies should be exercised with caution to avoid irreversible mistakes.
Some may argue that rapid progress is crucial, particularly during wartime. The availability of newer, more powerful weapons could determine victory or defeat. However, the repercussions of progress are also essential matters to consider. The United States successfully developed atomic bombs and detonated them in Japan, thereby concluding the Second World War. Nevertheless, the cost of the detonation was destitute radioactive Japanese soil and ill patients suffering from mutations. Innocent women gave birth to deformed babies because these mothers were affected by the radiation during pregnancy. The progression of atomic bomb technology ensured victory for the United States, but it resulted in a catastrophe for innocent people. Scientists might not have invented the atomic bomb if they had fully understood the implications of detonating atomic bombs.
In conclusion, process should not be shunned, but neither should it be the only objective of the society. People should explore every aspect of technological innovations to maximize the effectiveness of technology. GMOs and cloning remain controversial, but that does not signify that they are useless. GMOs could be used to regrow forests, and cloning could be used to bring back extinct species. The key to progress is not to fear it or blindly accept it, but to discern it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-22 | Mateo Chen | 83 | view |
| 2023-05-22 | Mateo Chen | 47 | view |
| 2022-08-26 | thelmascakess | 50 | view |
| 2021-11-21 | Lavanyal | 16 | view |
| 2021-11-21 | Prash | 16 | view |
- Claim Restaurants should be required to display nutritional information about the food they serve Reason This knowledge will help diners make healthy choices and reduce their risk of diet related health problems Write a response in which you discuss the e 66
- Scientific theories which most people consider as fact almost invariably prove to be inaccurate Thus one should look upon any information described as factual with skepticism since it may well be proven false in the future Write an essay in which you take 83
- True beauty is found not in the exceptional but in the commonplace Write an essay in which you take a position on the statement above In developing and supporting your essay consider instances in which the statement does and does not hold true 64
- The following appeared in the City Council Proceedings section of the local newspaper in Smithville The city council of Smithville has recommended making changes to police procedures to improve the visibility of the police force These changes include hiri 58
- For a society to truly flourish dissent should be encouraged Respond to the above topic by composing an essay that states how much you agree or disagree with the given claim Be sure to use evidence to support your stance and to consider evidence that woul 83
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 11, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...void irreversible mistakes. Some may argue that rapid progress is crucial, particu...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, still, therefore, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2729.0 2235.4752809 122% => OK
No of words: 488.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59221311475 5.05705443957 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70007681154 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93645181485 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 270.0 215.323595506 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553278688525 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 846.0 704.065955056 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 10.0 1.77640449438 563% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.1089634557 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.961538462 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7692307692 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.65384615385 5.21951772744 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144111338059 0.243740707755 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0419272476217 0.0831039109588 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0378330409735 0.0758088955206 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0878086173309 0.150359130593 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0493529356482 0.0667264976115 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.1639044944 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.38706741573 118% => OK
difficult_words: 166.0 100.480337079 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 11, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...void irreversible mistakes. Some may argue that rapid progress is crucial, particu...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, still, therefore, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2729.0 2235.4752809 122% => OK
No of words: 488.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59221311475 5.05705443957 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70007681154 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93645181485 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 270.0 215.323595506 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553278688525 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 846.0 704.065955056 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 10.0 1.77640449438 563% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.1089634557 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.961538462 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7692307692 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.65384615385 5.21951772744 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144111338059 0.243740707755 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0419272476217 0.0831039109588 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0378330409735 0.0758088955206 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0878086173309 0.150359130593 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0493529356482 0.0667264976115 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.1639044944 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.38706741573 118% => OK
difficult_words: 166.0 100.480337079 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.