Team activities can teach more skills for life than those activities which are played alone. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many argue that team-based activities are more efficient than solo tasks. It depends on the work environment, as well as an opportunity to work both independently and as a team. So, this essay will discuss team activities that teach more life skills than those activities which we individual work.
On the one hand, teamwork can facilitate people's activities be more efficient. The different approaches can all contribute to team success and learning. Working closely in a team also helps build workplace relationships and creates a connected work environment. In addition, we can build relationships through teamwork. Besides, in individual work allows you to make your own decisions, which allows you to control a task easily. Individual work allows people to focus on what they want or need. Working individually, we can manage time and divide tasks easily.
On the other hand, working in a team sometimes causes disagreements about this issue. So when there is a big project we will meet to work together but there will be disputes about time. In addition, different opinions affect relationships. Individual work sometimes has a lot of pressure and many jobs we have no control over. Furthermore, we have the issue at that time, and when we call for someone it wastes a lot of time.
In conclusion, both teamwork and individual work bring benefits to individuals, but they also have disadvantages as well. But I still agree they are both beneficial, this is a reason why teamwork build relationship and individual work make someone control the work .
- The animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in sea What are the reasons and solutions 61
- Modern technology is changing our world It has advantages such as bringing people closer together through communication it also has disadvantages such as destroying the differences between cultures To what extend do you agree or disagree this statement 84
- The table below shows expenditures on advertising of four car companies in the UK in 2002
- More and more people want to buy clothes car and other products from well known brands What are the reasons Do you think it is a positive or negative development 78
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in New Port city center from 2003 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compa
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 562, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...can manage time and divide tasks easily. On the other hand, working in a team som...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 86, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s causes disagreements about this issue. So when there is a big project we will m...
^^
Line 7, column 249, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'controls'.
Suggestion: controls
...onship and individual work make someone control the work .
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 265, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...idual work make someone control the work .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, if, so, still, well, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1313.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14901960784 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.009929754 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556862745098 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.4052338768 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.5333333333 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193823852564 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0774277000662 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104134072834 0.0667982634062 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132225938268 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131044619228 0.056905535591 230% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.