Students should always question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively.
In this attempt it is revealed that accepting an unknown thing without understanding it properly is not effective. The students are novice in case of learning which requires realize the matter properly rather than accepting the implemented thoughts and ideas. In school pupils are taught various things including course subjects, manner, discipline, responsibility to the society, games etc. All the mentioned tasks they have to complete within a certain interval of time. Gathering of knowledge and personal enrichment may be achieved by keeping balance with the schedule of study.
The stated assumption inspires to be eager to the process of learning to become more creative and competent. For, instance a study* of a group of students shows that 70% of the students who ask questions to the teacher during teaching session either understand the discussed topic properly or able to understand very closer the concept of discussion and may contribute efficient output which increases their confidence level. This study also includes that 30 % of them understand the ideas in their own way rather than the way of teachers thinking which in turn develop their creativity and extend the views. Moreover, the study comments that if the students are interactive then the mentors have to be alerted, qualified and developed to meet the thirst of curiosity in order to fuel the creativity and those who have the tendency to absorb the delivery of the teacher without analyzing is always dependent on others ideas, decisions and also have a lack of confidence. The study insist to be more curious rather than a follower.
The mentioned topics also high lights on the role of the teachers and students during teaching and learning respectively. Academics institutions are the places where people are guided to develop their creativity, flourish their ideas and way of thinking. The education process can ignite the innovative minds (students) and innovative minds may curious for the reason behind it. This may improves their analytical ability and develops logical thinking. They will be more competent in problem solving tactics in the real world. The ideas and skill developed inside these creative minds may act as a server of innovative ideas in present and future for the betterment of the nation as well as the world.
Contrary, not questioning attitude is expected for defense personnel during war to maintain discipline and avoid failure where personal creativity is not expected and allowed but real world totally different from this types of exception.
Seeking the reason of occurrence of a simple incidence may lead to a great invention. For example, one of the researchers during conducting an experiment found one day that the chocolate which he kept for eating inside the laboratory becomes melted and he could not find the reason for melting it under controlled temperature inside the laboratory. He could not concentrate on his research work until his innovative mind finds out the reason behind it. Questioning and answering with self finally lead him to find that there was the presence of Microwave inside the laboratory which is responsible for the melting of the chocolate and this finally leads to the great invention of microwave appliances.
The attempt of the assumption is to become more enthusiastic while learning and not to be idle. There is a possibility of asking unnecessary questions by the students, ill intention to harass a teacher, diversion from the main track, creation of ambiguity and all these may cause loss of time which is always limited as per schedule in the institutions. As, a consequence it may hamper the learning process overly. Above discussion states that knowledge regarding different topics can be compared as a password protected document and the questions regarding the knowledge are the combination of the password to open and achieved it. The importance of self-developing process through questioning and validating it by the mentors cannot be omitted.
- Nation should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed 66
- Government officials should rely on their own judgement rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people whom they serve 66
- Government officials should rely on their own judgement rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people whom they serve 66
- Students should always question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively 66
- Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significants numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 214, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...d but real world totally different from this types of exception. Seeking the reason...
^^^^
Line 9, column 355, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ed as per schedule in the institutions. As, a consequence it may hamper the learni...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, then, thus, well, while, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 14.8657303371 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 92.0 58.6224719101 157% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 12.9106741573 170% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3375.0 2235.4752809 151% => OK
No of words: 643.0 442.535393258 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24883359253 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.03561760524 4.55969084622 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83387220276 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 311.0 215.323595506 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48367029549 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 1059.3 704.065955056 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 80.9146401715 60.3974514979 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.807692308 118.986275619 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7307692308 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.92307692308 5.21951772744 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 10.2758426966 195% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109122622407 0.243740707755 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0277839379251 0.0831039109588 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0286329143915 0.0758088955206 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0560577789386 0.150359130593 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0311593061863 0.0667264976115 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 14.1392134831 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 178.0 100.480337079 177% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.