The graph shows the number of people taking part in 4 kinds of sports in a particular region between 1985 and 2005.
The given chart illustrates how many participants took part in four different sports in a specific area over a 20-year period, starting from 1985.
Overall, the number of participants playing rugby recorded a significant decline, while individuals playing tennis was on the growth to become the most playable sport in 2000 and 2005. In additon, relative stabilities between basketball and badminton were observed throughout the period.
According to the chart, the number of rugby players reached the highest point with 250 which explained it was the most popular sport in 1985 and then it gradually declined to 200 after 10 years. In the next 10-year period, a dramatic downfall of around 150 participants was recorded in rugby from 1995 to 2005. In contrast, the figure for tennis started at the second most popular sport with 150 players and it rapidly increased to 200 which matched the number of rugby players in 1995. In the last 10 years of the period, there was a significant increase in the number of people playing tennis, with around 75 and it became the most famous sport in 2000 and 2005.
Different from above, there wasn’t any difference in the number of individuals playing basketball and badminton throughout the period. To be more specific, basketball had approximately 80 people in 1985 and it remained exactly the same number 20 years later. Badminton had the following trend, the number of people playing the sport was lower, around 50.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-30 | tieuquynh | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-12 | Anne020304 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-09 | Anne020304 | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-31 | cassiexo | 76 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | Đức Tiến | view |
- The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed 73
- Many students find it difficult to concentrate or pay attention at school What are the reasons What could be done to solve this problem 78
- Many students find it difficult to concentrate or pay attention at school What are the reasons What could be done to solve this problem 73
- The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed 73
- Many students find it difficult to concentrate or pay attention at school What are the reasons What could be done to solve this problem 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 487, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ed the number of rugby players in 1995. In the last 10 years of the period, there ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1223.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 242.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05371900826 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6542470989 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.49173553719 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 339.3 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1468885845 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.3 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19973676963 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0878628373376 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0379710019613 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124268378199 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0176827119588 0.0819641961636 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.