Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods. Others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging. Discuss both views and give your opinion
Opinions are divided on who has the responsibility to constrain the packaging used. While some argue that manufacturers and supermarkets should limit the number of them, I firmly believe that customers play a more significant role in tackling this problem.
On the one hand, there are various measures that manufacturers and supermarkets could adopt to alleviate the abuse of plastic packaging. Firstly, manufacturers, who distribute their products to groceries and retail chains, may reduce the amount of their goods’ covering by packaging in a large box or using alternative materials that are friendly to the environment. Furthermore, supermarkets also engage in some environmental campaigns, such as hanging attractive banners related to the drawbacks of plastic and replacing one-time plastic wrappers with sustainable and fashionable packaging that their customers are able to use several times.
Beside the previously mentioned ideas, raising customers’ awareness is more important for the sustainable success of this campaign. First and foremost, the decisions of custormers to deny buying some products with a lot of packaging remarkably impact manufactories’ profits, leading to their toleration suited to custormers’ demands. Additionally, environmentally friendly materials are likely more expensive than plastic ones, leading to higher prices for such products. Therefore, if customers are willing to pay the extra amount, manufacturers will take considerable care in choosing packaging materials.
In conclusion, it is true that several measures can be proposed by manufacturers and supermarkets, I maintain that by appropriate regulations of customers decisions, this phenomenon can be ameliorated to a certain extent.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | quynhu | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | quynhu | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | RkmsU | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-06 | viviannguyen | 61 | view |
- Today TV channels broadcast man s sport shows more than women s sport shows Why Should TV channels give equal showtime for women s sport and men s sport 73
- People aim to achieve a balance between their work and lives But few people achieve it What are the causes of problems How to overcome it 89
- Some people say that in the modern world getting old is entirely bad Others however say that life for the elderly nowadays is much better than it was in the past Discuss both these views and give your opinion 67
- The charts below show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town A and town B in 1960 2010 84
- The number of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010 2012 and 2014 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 87, Rule ID: ADOPT_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'adapt to'?
Suggestion: adapt to
...at manufacturers and supermarkets could adopt to alleviate the abuse of plastic packagin...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 587, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to package'.
Suggestion: to package
...will take considerable care in choosing packaging materials. In conclusion, it is true t...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1496.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.96015936255 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.41120088641 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.621513944223 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.7771458574 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.6 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258409987517 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0915390543918 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537582920304 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140387759549 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0654083981177 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 13.0946893788 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 20.72 50.2224549098 41% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.58 12.4159519038 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.79 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.