Few languages are increasingly spoken in different countries, while the usage of others is rapidly declining. Is this a positive or a negative development?
It is widely recognized that certain languages are commonly used around the world, while others are on the verge of extinction. Despite some legitimate concerns, I believe this is a welcome development overall.
Granted, proponents of this trend often cite the fact that people speaking the same language helps eliminate the language barrier, making human interaction easier. Nonetheless, this thinking fails to factor in national characteristics that would be gradually lost to this trend, because language is the soul of a culture and is associated with the development process of a whole country. Under this circumstance, descendants will no longer understand the customs of their own nation. Evidence for this can be seen in several Vietnamese children who attend international schools from a young age are deeply affected by the Western lifestyle, they use English more fluently than their mother tongue, thereby getting rid of their unique culture.
What is more, using a globally accepted language not only diminishes linguistic obstacles but also enhances business opportunities. The key rationale is that in the era of globalization, employers have increasing requirements in language ability. Therefore, if job-seekers can only speak their native dialect, their occupation prospects will be restricted than those who can speak dominant language. This trend also has beneficial impacts thanks to the contribution to the country’s economic growth.
In a nutshell, I believe the global dominance of a limited number of languages is a positive development, with all advantageous influences on international communication and economic chances. However, despite certain benefits that it brings about, the importance of other languages must not be neglected.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-05 | ctbx312 | 78 | view |
| 2022-12-12 | vishal sachdeva | 80 | view |
| 2022-11-02 | vishal sachdeva | 80 | view |
| 2022-08-04 | Albert Armin | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-17 | hnhung | 73 | view |
- Students learn far more with their teachers than other sources internet or television To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Few languages are increasingly spoken in different countries while the usage of others is rapidly declining Is this a positive or a negative development 78
- Nowadays as women and men have to work full time household duties such as taking care children should be equally divided Do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people think young people should be free to choose his or her job but other people think they should be realistic and think more about their future Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people Why this is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to this place 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 260, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ments in language ability. Therefore, if job-seekers can only speak their native ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, nonetheless, so, therefore, while, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1504.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67547169811 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13510651245 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664150943396 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9002783122 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.333333333 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0833333333 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.91666666667 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195418343382 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717603869677 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0376135618762 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118929716013 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293633580159 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.15 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.