Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Investment by the government has garnered a great deal of publicity due to its influence on national progress. Given the suggestion that instead of investing invest in the arts, public services should be invested by the government. I partly agree with this idea.
It is understandable why several individuals think that the government investing in the arts is wasting money because it does not bring directly optimistic things for them, in contrast, if governments invest in public services it could services could bring positive changes that influence the convenience for human life. However, this thinking is flawed, the great benefit of public services have overshadowed the benefit of arts. Arts are beneficial to our mind. An example is that if humans encounter stress, they can find a song or a picture to lift up their mood and shake off their tension. However, art could also bone with friends and family. To illustrate, a friend's group or a family are having an agreement, they only listen to a meaningful song, and any conflicts could be solved.
On the other hand, if the government invests more in public services, the convenience in of human life could be improved. Firstly, the noise and air problems could be solved after governments require residents to use public transports and to update it. Not only that, this also resolves the traffic jam during the rust hour of their city. Secondly, the equipments of the school system could be improved,; therefore, students would have access to reality such as chemical components and physical phenomena.
In conclusion, I believe that the government should invest more in public service
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-08 | hanhkatori2402 | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-30 | thuhuyen29042006 | 89 | view |
| 2021-09-29 | Huonglando1710 | 56 | view |
| 2021-08-29 | Lunar Tran | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-09 | Sanaullah97 | 73 | view |
- People are living in a throwaway society using things for a short time and then throwing them away What are the causes of this What problems does it lead to 80
- The sales of gold in Dubai for 12 months in 2002 in millions of dirhams
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening Do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career while others believe that it is better to get a job straight after school Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- Government investment in the arts such as music and theatre is a waste of money Governments must invest this money in public services instead To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 178, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...instead of investing invest in the arts, public services should be invested by th...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ment. I partly agree with this idea. It is understandable why severa...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 246, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'service'
Suggestion: service
...ents invest in public services it could services could bring positive changes that influ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and any conflicts could be solved. On the other hand, if the govern...
^^^
Line 7, column 412, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , ;
...s of the school system could be improved,; therefore, students would have access t...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l components and physical phenomena. In conclusion, I believe that the govern...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1391.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15185185185 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76689473005 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588888888889 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.6093645063 49.4020404114 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3571428571 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.71428571429 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325864828519 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11254399496 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0860447637381 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226953404288 0.151304729494 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0757569436011 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.