The best way to teach children to cooperate is through team sports at school.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people think that playing team sports at school is the best approach to educate children about cooperation. I totally agree with this opinion for the reasons outlined below.
Sports have always been one of the most efficient methods to bring people closer. Team sports might help children to understand more about each other through the way they play and communicate throughout the match as the team members all share the same goal. The implication of this is that children can learn how to respect and listen to others’ viewpoints as well as how to control their own egos, which are essential qualities in team working. In fact, according to psychologists in China, dopamine, a positive chemical boosting the will to collaborate and connect in humans, is produced more while they are playing team sports. Clearly, it is great to teach students about cooperation in this way.
Furthermore, team sports can show students how to work with each other in the most overall way since collaboration requires both physical and mental connection. While group activities such as group assignment only demand either their intellectual or physical co - working, team sports includes not only their like - minded strategies but also their synergy in actions so as to win the game. This explains why people who used to be involved in a team sport at school often show more outstanding performance in companies where team working skill is a need. Obviously, team sports benefit children in many ways, especially in educating them about working in groups.
In conclusion, there are many methods to teach children about cooperation. However, in my point of view, team sports is the most optimal way to do so since it not only reinforces the relationship between team members but also enhances both their physical and cognitive ability in co - working.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-05 | linhlinh123 | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | caigicungduoc | 89 | view |
| 2024-03-27 | caigicungduoc | 89 | view |
| 2023-11-07 | tracywu | 61 | view |
| 2023-08-14 | thu200212 | 78 | view |
- Some people think that too much money has been spent looking after and repairing old buildings so we should knock down old buildings and build modern ones instead To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The best way to teach children to cooperate is through team sports at school To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The most important aim of science should be to improve people s lives To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing What do you think are the causes of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them 78
- Some people say that music plays an important role in society while others believe that it is simply a form of entertainment for individuals Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 369, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...egies but also their synergy in actions so as to win the game. This explains why people ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, so, well, while, as to, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1547.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10561056106 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69043973629 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567656765677 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.0694835204 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3076923077 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.69230769231 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294378905083 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107275740546 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638255122095 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189368789011 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0222795808482 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.