Wealthy nations should assist poorer countries with humanitarian relief during natural disasters. Do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that rich nations should support more impoverished countries with humanitarian assistance during natural disasters. This essay agrees with this statement due to amity and this help will improve global development.
The first reason for the agreement is that the cooperation between wealthier nations and less affluent countries through the provision of humanitarian aid during natural disasters holds the potential to foster stronger bonds of amity and goodwill among nations. When prosperous nations extend assistance to their less fortunate counterparts in times of crisis, a sense of solidarity and common purpose can develop. Such collaborative efforts, rooted in empathy and a shared responsibility for humanity, contribute to a positive framework of international relations, promoting understanding and unity among nations. For instance, Asian countries like Vietnam, Philippines, Cambodia,… affected by great storms often receive emergency aid from the Russian government and the amity among these countries are strong.
Secondly, this act of support not only addresses immediate needs but also demonstrates a commitment to global well-being and shared values. Impoverished nations, upon receiving aid, will reduce the burden of damages from disaster while simultaneously gaining the means to ensure the economy does not decline. Therefore, they can expedite their recovery and place their emphasis on developmental objectives without encountering interruptions. For example, many countries have learned medical relief methods through the assistance of doctors from developed nations during natural catastrophes.
In conclusion, developed countries should provide developing countries with humanitarian relief during natural disasters on account of the prospect of stronger bonds and worldwide development.
- Many university students want to learn about different subjects in addition to their main subjects Others feel it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for their qualification Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Wealthy nations should assist poorer countries with humanitarian relief during natural disasters Do you agree or disagree 78
- Many university students want to learn about different subjects in addition to their main subjects Others feel it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for their qualification Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Many university students want to learn about different subjects in addition to their main subjects Others feel it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for their qualification Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Many people argue that racial discrimination is a major issue that needs to be included in school education to build a peaceful and equal world Do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 681, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , …
...ries like Vietnam, Philippines, Cambodia,… affected by great storms often receive ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1584.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.1875 5.12529762239 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09831378976 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.62890625 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0454305462 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.0 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2727272727 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.45454545455 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305883145134 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116216500046 0.084324248473 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125426669789 0.0667982634062 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211463763285 0.151304729494 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.082444822673 0.056905535591 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.4 13.0946893788 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 50.2224549098 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.92 12.4159519038 152% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.82 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.