Genetic engineering is an important issue in society today. Some people think that it will improve people’s lives in many ways. Others feel that it may be a threat to life on earth. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
In this day and age, with the thriving growth of modern technology in society, there is no denying that genetic modification plays a crucial role in human lives, but it is also a controversial topic that often divides opinions. While many people assume that this field of technology has the potential to enhance people’s living quality in some ways, others oppose that it exists dangers behind it. From my point of view, I strongly oppose that the benefits of genetic engineering will outweigh the drawbacks, the following essay will take a look at both sides of the argument.
On the one hand, there are a number of obvious advantages brought by genetic engineering which cover mainly two aspects of food production and medical advances. In terms of the food production industry, it is clear that genetic technology significantly contributes to increased productivity for agriculture. In addition, it partly deals with famine and mitigates poverty in developing countries thanks to abundant food supplies. Another thing worth noting is a medical perspective which has brought breathtaking achievement in eliminating dangerous diseases and even having beneficial beauty. As an example to illustrate it is that only when were vaccines for COVID-19 invented by scientists, the rate of human mortality had signs of decline across the world about a few years ago. Another convict example is that human longevity is more expanded, and more resilient to the natural aging process by abusing supplementation of hormones and filler.
However, genetic engineering can backfire and create unintended outcomes for fauna and flora. Regarding the loss of ecosystem balance realm, the rise of genetically modified organisms can cause a reduction in biodiversity because genetic technology somewhat disrupts the natural way and complexity of life. To illustrate, producing a variety of corn will release toxic agents that become resistant to diseases and natural predators like insects, even killing them. As a result, this intervention accompanies with the disappearance of some birds that feed on those insects. Another disadvantage is that it is regarded as an ethical concern and the probability of abuse is very high in the cloning of humans. For example, in the case of DOLLY sheep, more than 277 attempts were produced before a viable clone was produced. This only suggests that if humans were to be cloned, scientists would need to conduct numerous “failed” attempts.
In conclusion, I am convinced that genetic engineering will have positive impacts on our lives, but once is it misused purposes, it will lead to unprecedented consequences.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-21 | linhmysuni85@gmail.com | 89 | view |
| 2023-10-21 | linhmysuni85@gmail.com | 89 | view |
| 2023-10-21 | linhmysuni85@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | thecong2007 | 80 | view |
| 2023-03-10 | hyst12 | 78 | view |
- Each year the crime rate increases What are the causes of crime and what could be done to prevent this rise in criminal activity 89
- Topic Many criminals re offend after they have been punished Why do some people continue to commit crimes after they have been punished and what measures can be taken to tackle this problem 89
- Genetic engineering is an important issue in society today Some people think that it will improve people s lives in many ways Others feel that it may be a threat to life on earth Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 89
- Topic Many criminals re offend after they have been punished Why do some people continue to commit crimes after they have been punished and what measures can be taken to tackle this problem 61
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, regarding, so, while, another thing, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2235.0 1615.20841683 138% => OK
No of words: 417.0 315.596192385 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35971223022 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97537659948 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 176.041082164 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611510791367 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 719.1 506.74238477 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8956580925 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.470588235 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5294117647 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159600833565 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0428825051044 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476412084287 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0960517799755 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0528772444559 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.32 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 145.0 78.4519038076 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 9.78957915832 189% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, regarding, so, while, another thing, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2235.0 1615.20841683 138% => OK
No of words: 417.0 315.596192385 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35971223022 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97537659948 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 176.041082164 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611510791367 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 719.1 506.74238477 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8956580925 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.470588235 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5294117647 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159600833565 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0428825051044 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476412084287 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0960517799755 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0528772444559 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.32 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 145.0 78.4519038076 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 9.78957915832 189% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.