A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Students are the greatest assets of any nation, and education serves as a crucial tool in preparing them to lead their respective nations in the future. Currently, there is an ongoing debate regarding whether students should follow a national curriculum until they enter college or be divided into specialized curriculums from a young age. I strongly support the latter, and here are three reasons why.
Firstly, students often have varying strengths, weaknesses, and preferences, and they may not be mature enough at a young age to fully understand these aspects. By studying under a general curriculum, students are exposed to a range of subjects, allowing them to explore their interests and choose the right field for themselves. This can result in the development of passionate professionals who enjoy their work and can contribute their best efforts towards the betterment of the nation. For instance, a student may excel in math at a young age but lose interest over time. Having the flexibility to explore different subjects can help them discover new interests and prevent them from being stuck in a field that no longer excites them. By facilitating personal growth and preventing wasted potential, a nation benefits as a whole.
Secondly, education aims to equip students with the necessary knowledge and skills to succeed in both their personal and professional lives. In any occupation, collaboration between individuals from different fields is often required to complete projects and achieve desired outcomes. If students are not educated under a general curriculum for a certain period, there may be gaps in their knowledge, leading to conflicts and difficulties in such collaborations. Additionally, a well-rounded education system fosters a more aware and alert citizenry who understand the workings of their nation and can voice their concerns when necessary. Being aware of one's surroundings is crucial for responsible citizenship, and a generalized education system provides the foundational knowledge needed to lead a fulfilling life. Subjects like math and English, for example, are essential for everyone, and if certain individuals do not receive instruction in these areas due to different curriculums, they will struggle in their daily lives. Moreover, a general curriculum ensures equal opportunities for all students, allowing them to grow and thrive in a conducive environment. Neglecting a student's education by assigning them to a field with a low social standing at a young age denies them the chance to improve and deprives them of their right to a basic education. By providing an equal playing field for each person, a general curriculum allows all students to flourish and reach their potential.
However, some argue that by focusing on specific skills from a young age, a generation of highly skilled individuals can be produced. While this may hold true for a few exceptional students, it is not a system that benefits the majority. Instead of establishing a system that hinders the potential of most students, targeted support and resources can be provided to nurture and guide extraordinary talents towards the right path. In conclusion, for a nation to thrive, its students must be given the opportunities to excel in their respective fields. By placing students in a general curriculum, they are able to explore their interests and contribute to a productive population that excels in their chosen domains and collaborates effectively across diverse professions. While special guidance can be offered to exceptional students, basic education is a fundamental right that should be accessible to all individuals.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-18 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 66 | view |
| 2024-11-09 | KLH | 66 | view |
| 2024-09-28 | ascetichedonist | 83 | view |
| 2024-08-30 | Rishab@1999 | 66 | view |
| 2024-08-27 | Rishab@1999 | 50 | view |
- Competition for high grades seriously limits the quality of learning at all levels of education Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In deve 66
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 66
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts 66
- Claim It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero Reason The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree o 66
- In any field of inquiry the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions 66
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 655, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...concerns when necessary. Being aware of ones surroundings is crucial for responsible...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1182, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...n a conducive environment. Neglecting a students education by assigning them to a field ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 14.8657303371 175% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 74.0 58.6224719101 126% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3091.0 2235.4752809 138% => OK
No of words: 572.0 442.535393258 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40384615385 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.89045207381 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07799319837 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 292.0 215.323595506 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51048951049 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 968.4 704.065955056 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3441787194 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.791666667 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8333333333 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.21951772744 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 10.2758426966 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224371411159 0.243740707755 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0660775746178 0.0831039109588 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0759082900184 0.0758088955206 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171832349799 0.150359130593 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101604458158 0.0667264976115 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.1639044944 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.38706741573 114% => OK
difficult_words: 172.0 100.480337079 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 655, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...concerns when necessary. Being aware of ones surroundings is crucial for responsible...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1182, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...n a conducive environment. Neglecting a students education by assigning them to a field ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 14.8657303371 175% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 74.0 58.6224719101 126% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3091.0 2235.4752809 138% => OK
No of words: 572.0 442.535393258 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40384615385 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.89045207381 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07799319837 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 292.0 215.323595506 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51048951049 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 968.4 704.065955056 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3441787194 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.791666667 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8333333333 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.21951772744 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 10.2758426966 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224371411159 0.243740707755 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0660775746178 0.0831039109588 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0759082900184 0.0758088955206 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171832349799 0.150359130593 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101604458158 0.0667264976115 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.1639044944 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.38706741573 114% => OK
difficult_words: 172.0 100.480337079 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.