The drawbacks to the use of nuclear power mean that it is not a long term solution to the problem of meeting ever-increasing energy needs
Proponents of nuclear energy as "the power source for the future" have long touted its relative economy, "clean-burning" technolagy, and virtually inexhaustible fuel supply. However, a lose examination of the issue reveals that nuclear energy proves more problematic and dangerous than other forms of energy production and thus is not an acceptable solution to the problem of meeting ever-increasing energy needs.
First and foremost, nuclear power production presents the problem of radioactive waste storage. Fuel byproducts from nuclear fission remain toxic for thousands of years, and the spills and leaks from existing storage sites have been hazardous and costly to clean up, This remains true despite careful regulation and even under the best of circumstances. Even more appalling is the looming threat of accidents at the reactor itself: Incidents at the Three Mile Island and Chemobyl power plants and at other production sites have warned us that the consequences of a nuclear meltdown can be catastrophic and felt worldwide.
But beyond the enormous long-term environmental problems and short-term health risks, the bottom-line issue for the production of energy is one of economics. Power production in our society is a business just like any other
and the large companies that produce this country's electricity and gas claim they are unsble to make alternatives such as solar power affordable. Yet-largely due to incentives from the federal government there already exist homes heated by solar power and cars fueled by the sun. If the limited resources devoted to dats to such energy alternatives have already produced working models, a more intensive, broadly based and supported effort is likely to make those altematives less expensive an arablematic.
Besides the benefits in terms of both cost and safety, renewable resources such as solar and hydroelectric power represent far better options in the long run for development. Thess options require money only for the materials needed to harvest the renewable resources. While suright and water are free, the innovative technologies and industrial strategies devised to harness them have created a geometric progression of spin-offs affecting fields as diverse as agriculture, real estate, space exploration, and social policy. These options also repeatedly prodused secondary economic and social benefits, such as the large recreational and irrigation reservoirs created in the American Southwest behind large hydnoelectric dams like the Hoover and Grand Coulee.
While it may now be dear that the drawtacks to the use of nuclear power are too great, it should also be apparent that the long-term benefits of renewable resources would reward investment. I these altematives are explored more seriously than they have been in the past, safer and less expensive scurces of power will undoul-edly live up to their promise. With limited resources at our disposal and a burgeoning global population to consider, further investment in nuclear power would mark an unconscionable and unnecessary waste of time and money
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-27 | Oladelejnrr | 83 | view |
| 2023-10-17 | Oladelejnrr | 50 | view |
| 2023-04-18 | TatianaGHGH | 66 | view |
| 2021-11-19 | adrienne2 | 66 | view |
| 2020-04-02 | elisabetta_fedele | 50 | view |
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society one must study its major cities 66
- People who have high expectations for others are rewarded with high performance and respect 50
- Technological advancement has made our lives easier and more convenient but it has also brought about significant ethical challenges To what extent should ethical considerations shape the development and use of technology 50
- Title The Influence of Challenges on the Perceived Greatness of Political Leaders 66
- Teachers salaries should be based on their students academic performance 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 204, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...lly inexhaustible fuel supply. However, a lose examination of the issue reveals that n...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...ty is a business just like any other and the large companies that produce this c...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, thus, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 30.0 14.8657303371 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2635.0 2235.4752809 118% => OK
No of words: 474.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55907172996 5.05705443957 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66599839874 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07979666558 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 274.0 215.323595506 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57805907173 0.4932671777 117% => OK
syllable_count: 836.1 704.065955056 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.8056578408 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 164.6875 118.986275619 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.625 23.4991977007 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8125 5.21951772744 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270609723048 0.243740707755 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0803084962005 0.0831039109588 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0746430626506 0.0758088955206 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129287715894 0.150359130593 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0750226615408 0.0667264976115 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.6 14.1392134831 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.12 48.8420337079 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 12.1743820225 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.56 12.1639044944 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.07 8.38706741573 120% => OK
difficult_words: 150.0 100.480337079 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.7820224719 170% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.