In more and more countries, people choose to give money on special occasions rather than personally giving gifts. Why might this be the case? Is it a positive or negative development?
Presenting a gift in one’s special day receives fewer interests among society from many nations, they tend to handle recipients a cash-filled envelope. This essay will outline the reasons behind the problem, however, I would initiate to greater disadvantages.
First of all, one of notable reasons is that monetary gift is more likely practical and functional to meet someone’s financial value, implemented in Korean wedding. Most of congratulatory money from guests are used by couple for paying receptions charge and somewhat for honeymoon purpose. Furthermore, the homogeneity types of personal gift selection fail to meet recipient's preferences resulting in wasteful stuff. Regarding that, in Western society, people are used to entail gift interests in the invitation which should be selected by the givers, potentially causing difficulties for them to grant such lists.
On the other hand, we should emphasize some drawbacks of this is that financial gift may be seen less thoughtful lacking emotional connection. Seemingly, older age groups avoid giving money, especially on Christmas in which they should engage deeper on their family relation as well as representing the value of loving and caring. Moreover, perceiving cash for certain occasions is considered to be indifferent and rude, reflecting unwillingness to put some effort to gift-giving. Gift Idea Space explained s that, in spite of easily acceptable, those who hand over gifts to their beloved ones will be remembered so that its existence can be appreciated and used indefinitely.
To sum up, several reasonable factors lie behind the tendency of giving money on special occasion including financial function and averting inefficient gift. Meanwhile, I would refute the demerits of this ranging from declining people’s bonding relationship to perceiving negative personal values.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-18 | MEBC Class | 80 | view |
| 2023-12-20 | MEBC Class | 89 | view |
| 2023-12-18 | BoyClazz | 67 | view |
- Technology allows food to be produced in greater quantities and at lower prices Some people believe this is a positive development while others believe it is harmful Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
- It has been suggested that primary children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Some people believe that nowadays too much money is being spent on weddings and birthdays Why do you think it is happening What can be done to improve the situation 80
- In more and more countries people choose to give money on special occasions rather than personally giving gifts Why might this be the case Is it a positive or negative development 89
- In some cultures children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, well, while, as well as, first of all, in spite of, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1587.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64768683274 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02018890368 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.679715302491 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.3901847789 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 132.25 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4166666667 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.9166666667 7.06120827912 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229040737998 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0732640928137 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.035705073533 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129909361405 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0564863563955 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.62 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.