International tourism has brought enormous benefits to many places. At the same time, there is concern about its impact on local inhabitants and the environment. Do disadvantages outweigh the advantages?
International tourism has many positive sides to many areas, but, which affects indigenous people and environment surroundings. I believe the consequences significantly affect to indigenous people and their surroundings, including problems caused by foreigners and landscape changes. I will elucidate these point of views in the following paragraphs.
On the one hand, international tourism is beneficial to indigenous people. First, local residents can show their local wisdom in front of travellers. This can be done by showing traditional dance or selling traditional food. By this, foreign people would recognize the uniqueness of the region. Second, it could support local economic growth. This is because international tourism would provide more job opportunities for local inhabitants as tour guides or merchants. Therefore, the regional economic condition would rise gradually because of the existence of world travellers.
On the other hand, we should consider several drawbacks of this issue. In several areas, there are problems caused by visitors coming from other countries because they ignore local customs. Some places usually have unwritten ethical norms that settlers should be aware of. To cite an example, foreigners in Bali Island committed an inappropriate behaviour, such as speeding up their vehicles when indigenous people celebrated worship traditions the road in previous year. Surely, this case generated restlessness in society. In addition, if the local area were developed into tourism destinations, some landscapes would possibly change. By this, more and more public facilities such as villas, access roads, or clubs would be built by government or local entrepreneurs in order to provide accommodation for the visitors Indirectly, the amount of green area would reduce significantly.
In conclusion, it seems that the global tourism’s disadvantages outweigh the advantages. These include social unpleasantness by impolite tourists and reduction of green open space areas.
- International tourism has brought enormous benefits to many places At the same time there is concern about its impact on local inhabitants and the environment Do disadvantages outweigh the advantages 84
- International tourism has brought enormous benefits to many places At the same time there is concern about its impact on local inhabitants and the environment Do disadvantages outweigh the advantages 89
- International tourism has brought enormous benefits to many places At the same time there is concern about its impact on local inhabitants and the environment Do disadvantages outweigh the advantages 84
- The demand for coaching services has grown significantly in the digital age with online coaching platforms becoming prevalent Some now feel online coaching is a superior option to in person coach To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Around the world rural people are moving to cities and urban areas so populations in the countryside are decreasing Is this a positive or negative development
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 545, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lessness in society. In addition, if the local area were developed into tourism d...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, therefore, as to, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1724.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.86394557823 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11681943275 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632653061224 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.3871583789 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.7368421053 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4736842105 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26315789474 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132995636642 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0419987958656 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531842889877 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0825224805662 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0211904803289 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.41 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.