In spite of the advances made in argiculture, many people around the world still go hungry.
Why is this the case?
What can be done about this problem?
These days, while agriculture is considerably developing, there are still various public who are againsting with the lack of food. This essay will point out various causes behind this phenomenon before provind several possible solutions which contribute to preventing this problem.
There are several reasons why while
agriculture is improving in technology and smart ways, there are still numerous
residents who are struggling with starvation. First and foremost, the more
development of the agricultural sector is rising, the more overpopulation is
occurring. This means that population boom will lead to the increasing people’s
demand for food, but in various nations, especially in some developing
countries, the governments still do not have the appropriate policy which accommodate
the increasing for food. Moreover, the harsh weather conditions combined
natural disasters dramatically affect farming all around the world. The
reason is that, when the farmers plant several kinds of food crops, if typhoons,
floods or droughts occur, they will damage that crop in the most incredible
way. For instance, the middle of Viet Nam has struggled with various natural
disasters from the past and until now, which have the ability to prevent the
development of this region and make it become the poorest area of Viet Nam.
Although there are various causes, there are still numerous solutions which have the ability to cover all of those reasons. One of the main points is that the governments should strictly manage several policies such as laws about birth control or family planning. This will help the countries slow down the population growth rate, which contributes to accomplishing their controlling of population, and decreasing individuals’ demands of food. Furthermore, about the environmental condition, the authorities should set up a natural disaster warning system, informing the farmers about the imminent extreme event in the near future. This means people will deal with the natural disasters with minimum impact, leading to ensuring the crop yield will not reduce. The solution is to make sure that people will not need to struggle with lack of food, they will have enough for their living.
In conclusion, lack of food supplies all around the world has various reasons, but there are still numerous options to deal with that problem. The main point is that the governments of each countries and also the residents have to take actions to maintain and enhance their food supplies in the future.
- The bar chart provides information about how often people in the USA spent ate fast food from 2003 to 2013 The bar chart provides information about how often people in the USA spent ate fast food from 2003 to 2013 The bar chart provides information about 73
- The picture illustrates the disparity of a park named Grange Park between 1920 and today 67
- Some experts suggest that when a country is already rich any additional increase in economic wealth does not make its citizens happier To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The diagram illustrates the process of making olive oil along a production line 78
- Some argue that music mainly serves as a way for individuals to reduce their stress and anxiety To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 16, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t become the poorest area of Viet Nam. Although there are various causes, there...
^^^
Line 18, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hey will have enough for their living. In conclusion, lack of food supplies all...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, still, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2154.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 396.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43939393939 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72719790395 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525252525253 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 630.9 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 10.0 2.52805611222 396% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4142205928 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.625 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1875 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 17.0 4.38176352705 388% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146377850224 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0509442283449 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440063073998 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0430529630509 0.151304729494 28% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0475419928933 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.