Some people think the manufacturers and shopping malls should sell fewer packaged products while others argue that people have the responsibility to buy products with less packaging. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Some individuals believe that producers and retail stores ought to offer fewer packaged items, while others contend that it is consumers to choose products with minimal packaging. makers and shopping centers have the responsibility of manufacturing fewer packaged goods. This essay will firstly, discuss why does the packaging is the suppliers’ responsibility and then, discuss why others see that this is the consumers’ responsibility.
First things first, some people believe that reducing the over usage of packaging is the providers responsibility as that factories produce products with a massive amount of packaging that leads to environmental problems like when excess plastic is thrown away may cause danger to a lot of living animals, so when factories reduce the amount of encasement of products this will reduce the damage. Moreover, malls and providers always give the consumer the product whit its package, so sometimes.
On the other hand, other people argue that changing the consumers’ purchasing behavior is the main solution for overpackaging. This is because when people are aware with the overpackage problems and cease purchasing items with several layers of packaging, overpackage can be tackled. If a considerable portion of people still refuses to buy simple packaged products, shopping centers must keep offering overpackaged items to maintain their sales and revenue. Furthermore, customers can support environmentally friendly businesses by increasing their purchases, thereby expanding the market demand for sustainable products.
In a nutshell, both providers and consumers should take accountability for creating the trend of using excessive packaging. In my opinion, I believe that the responsibility for decreasing overpackaging and better environment is more for firms and shop centers as it’s easier for them as they can easily give the consumers no choice but to take products with simple packages.
- The graphs below show unemployment rates and average earnings according to level of education Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The charts show average level of participation in education and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore 73
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country 40
- The diagram details the process of making leather products 84
- Some people think that success is the best measure for intelligence while others think intelligence can be measured in other ways What is your opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 181, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Makers
...choose products with minimal packaging. makers and shopping centers have the responsib...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 90, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'providers'' or 'provider's'?
Suggestion: providers'; provider's
...cing the over usage of packaging is the providers responsibility as that factories produc...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 139, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...ing excessive packaging. In my opinion, I believe that the responsibility for dec...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, still, then, while, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1658.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69759450172 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11022952688 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594501718213 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 81.6835255551 49.4020404114 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.727272727 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4545454545 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.90909090909 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345493142093 0.244688304435 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124271159535 0.084324248473 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681711248413 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191407539646 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0712797340168 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.0946893788 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 50.2224549098 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.08 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.