Some people believe that confidence wins bigger games that knowledge alone cannot. Also, that accumulating knowledge makes no sense until one has the confidence to put it to use. Is it true that knowledge will help one win a struggle only if it is put into practice with full confidence, or is it confidence without knowledge that is null and void?
It has always been a moot factor to concede the fact that knowledge is imperative and indispensable as confidence. Let's delve further into the discussion to know in depth.
Have we even seen our school teachers earning more than their students? Did we ever notice that why teachers are not political leaders, industrialist or bureaucrats? Albeit they have all the knowledge to become successful in life but it's not true. They teach us the law of nature, rule of society and ethics of economy. That is because knowledge alone never ascends to summit in real life. Many often we have observed that the school or college or university dean and professor are less knowledgeable but have more confidence to handle the student. This quality of confidence makes them leaders and chairman of universities. A society also elects that person who has knowledge, provided he/she has the confidence to prove his onus to the society with indispensable acts.
Ancient history also support to the fact that priests have all the knowledge but the ruler was the one having all these knowledge but edged by heap of confidence. The army was motivated and ruled by a leader who has the confidence to win the battle not only the battle knacks help always.
Majority of the Government is supported and ruled by the bureaucrats and industrialist, are these just knowledge that help them ascend their path or the confident and captive hold on the market. Apparently, knowledge is a key to all these calculations and one need confidence to drive the knowledge in correct direction to reap the success is main prospect.
As per the above arguments and evidences, I would concede and advocate the fact that knowledge is base but confidence added to the knowledge is par above all to win bigger game.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-08-14 | udhay | 72 | view |
2019-08-12 | bashob | 80 | view |
2019-08-12 | bashob | 77 | view |
2019-07-30 | edsonsimoes | 55 | view |
2019-07-26 | edsonsimoes | 55 | view |
- The claim that animals have rights has been subjected as a matter of debate since the 1970’s. Are zoos helping or hurting our animals? Should zoos be banned? 77
- What do you think about our environment considering the fact that there has been steady increase in pollution and affects like global warming are increasing as time is passing by? Are we under jeopardy? Is the humanity safe? 77
- Some people believe that confidence wins bigger games that knowledge alone cannot. Also, that accumulating knowledge makes no sense until one has the confidence to put it to use. Is it true that knowledge will help one win a struggle only if it is put int 77
- The claim that animals have rights has been subjected as a matter of debate since the 1970s. Are zoos helping or hurting our animals? Should zoos be banned? 77
- As global trade increases between different countries, many daily necessities are produced in other countries. Such goods are usually transported a long distance. Do the benefits of this trend outweigh its drawbacks? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 116, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...rative and indispensable as confidence. Lets delve further into the discussion to kn...
^^^^
Line 4, column 115, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this knowledge' or 'these knowledges'?
Suggestion: this knowledge; these knowledges
...ge but the ruler was the one having all these knowledge but edged by heap of confidence. The a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 130, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r was the one having all these knowledge but edged by heap of confidence. The arm...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 8.36945812808 239% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 20.9802955665 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1479.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 301.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91362126246 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77339199935 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544850498339 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 475.2 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.65517241379 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7965276432 50.4703680194 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6 104.977214359 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0666666667 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.93333333333 7.25397266985 27% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303873794732 0.242375264174 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0928142900591 0.0925447433944 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0714341067911 0.071462118173 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173193390464 0.151781067708 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0657367262415 0.0609392437508 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 12.6369458128 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.5310837438 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.32886699507 94% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 55.0591133005 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.94827586207 60% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.