Company Top level Authorities should or should not take employees suggestions or ideas to take any decisions. Discuss.
Higher level employees have included other employees in decisions and strategies of companies. Some people believe that decisions should be not taken by low-level workers, while others believe that they should be actively involved in all decisions. This essay will why employees should be part of the decision-making process of companies.
Firstly, management positions should accept ideas from employees to draw companies’ strategies. These workers are on the front line and are accurately aware of what are the problems that impact the progress of companies. For example, telemarketing workers who have an active involvement with issues reported by customers. Obviously, these team workers have the ideal preparation for clearly define suggestions to improve companies processes and minimise issues.
Secondly, low-level employees should be contributors to develop new ideas for their companies. They have theoretical knowledge and analytical skills which can contribute significantly to the success of the firms. For example, system analysts who are capable to design apps that help all other employees to manage their tasks. Certainly, this will benefit employees to allow more time to design smarter processes for their role.
Companies have been added low-level employees to contribute to their decisions. In my opinion, low-level employees should be contributive in the strategies and new ideas of the companies.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 290, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'parted'?
Suggestion: parted
...This essay will why employees should be part of the decision-making process of compa...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, while, as for, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1217.0 1207.87684729 101% => OK
No of words: 211.0 242.827586207 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.76777251185 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99815386096 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 139.433497537 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559241706161 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 370.8 379.143842365 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.8243768417 50.4703680194 39% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.6153846154 104.977214359 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2307692308 20.9669160288 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76923076923 7.25397266985 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249358405193 0.242375264174 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101873440266 0.0925447433944 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0809871149197 0.071462118173 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171527203626 0.151781067708 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.058128563701 0.0609392437508 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 12.6369458128 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 53.1260098522 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.89 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 55.0591133005 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.