Medical technology can increase humans life expectancy Is it a blessing or a curse

Essay topics:

Medical technology can increase humans life expectancy. Is it a blessing or a curse?

Nowadays, advances in medical technology has the capability to further improve life expectancy of humans. The benefits it has brought has always been an interesting topic as some do not firmly believe and support this technology as it has more drawbacks to humans.

For others, the result of the improvement and advancement of medical technology has been a blessing. It has benefitted the human race by providing a reliable and effective cure to illnesses that has caused a lot of deaths. One case in point is the advancement in the gene technology. Doctors are now able to edit the DNA of human and use it to cure life threatening diseases such as cancer and completely eliminate any potential disabilities on a baby. Hence, it solves any potential health problems and it prolong the life of humans. This strengthen their position to believe that the benefits of medical technology are a blessing to human race.

On the other hand, the view of other people is contrary to what has been stated above. They believe that the use of medical technology is more like a curse. They argue that advancement in gene technology could cause a disruption to natural human life. Moreover, it may result to unethical medical practice wherein people will use it on their own benefit.

In conclusion, I am in full support of the medical technology used to increase human’s life expectancy and I consider it as a blessing. Definitely, the positive effects outweigh the disadvantages.

Votes
Average: 5.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 508, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'prolongs'?
Suggestion: prolongs
...es any potential health problems and it prolong the life of humans. This strengthen the...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, may, moreover, so, then, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1233.0 1207.87684729 102% => OK
No of words: 247.0 242.827586207 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99190283401 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9039715669 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 139.433497537 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51012145749 0.580463131201 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 413.1 379.143842365 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.1923428594 50.4703680194 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.0714285714 104.977214359 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6428571429 20.9669160288 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.25397266985 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3430455711 0.242375264174 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117450681698 0.0925447433944 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113616247898 0.071462118173 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222114936335 0.151781067708 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0599650090701 0.0609392437508 98% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 12.6369458128 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.1260098522 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.5310837438 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.32886699507 99% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 55.0591133005 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.