Parents should be held legally responsible for their children’s acts. What is your opinion? Support it with personal examples.
The responsibility of children's acts is highly discussed among people. Many believe that parents should take their duty more efficiently in the way to be responsible for their legal actions. This essay will discuss some points of the topic and give a brief conclusion.
To begin, the behaviour of youngsters are strongly affected by the choices of their parents. The emulation of these acts by children is the most important fact which led the belief that parents are responsible for children's actions. For example, many children copy their parent’s behavioural habits when smoking. Certainly, these youngsters will become addict smokers in the near future.
In addition, the most powerful affirmative of the responsibility of the acts of children is that they teach everything to them. The role of teaching good behaviour and how to life in society is parent's duty. For instance, when a child throws rubbish on the wrong place the responsibility is of his parents to teach the right place. Obviously, this child will behave in a proper manner.
In conclusion, the legal responsibility of children should be held by their parents. The emulation of the acts and how to behave are key points that parents must have the influence on their children. In my opinion, parents are legally responsible for their children acts.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 366, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a proper manner" with adverb for "proper"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...lace. Obviously, this child will behave in a proper manner. In conclusion, the legal responsibili...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1112.0 1207.87684729 92% => OK
No of words: 216.0 242.827586207 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14814814815 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87818529933 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 139.433497537 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509259259259 0.580463131201 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 333.9 379.143842365 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 1.56157635468 448% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.5024630542 73% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.1805723622 50.4703680194 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 79.4285714286 104.977214359 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4285714286 20.9669160288 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.381629593928 0.242375264174 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144698025907 0.0925447433944 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.14529432152 0.071462118173 203% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253746086527 0.151781067708 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.132381946944 0.0609392437508 217% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 12.6369458128 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.1260098522 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.9458128079 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 11.5310837438 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.32886699507 94% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 55.0591133005 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.3980295567 77% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.5123152709 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.