It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours
It is unavailable to have a job during a one’s life and People spend most of their time at work. Some people may hold the view that having a job in three days a week with long hours is more enjoyable than a five days a job with shorter hours. However, some others may take an opposite viewpoint. From my own perspective, the latter belief is true. In what follows, I will pinpoint the most outstanding reasons.
The first reason coming to mind to substantiate my standpoint is concerned with this issue that long hours a job may cause people to exhaust and tired. Due to the fact that the human body has a limited ability to work, so long hours lead to not only physical problems but mental problems as well. Hence, working in this environment brings about dissatisfaction. For example, when I worked for a company a couple of years ago, my boss decided to change working hours. We had to work more than two hours of working hours. Eventually, employees were frustrated and decide to quit their job. The more working hours, the more dissatisfaction.
Another reason which deserves some words here is that with working more than regular hours people dedicate their more time to work. In other words, they do not much leisure time to spend their time on personal issues such as their families, communication with their friends, going to travel and so forth. If people do not have enough time to rest to be fresh, they will not enjoy anything, especially from their work. Take an example, my cousin worked in a company abroad. Since his work lasted many hours we were not able to meet him even in holidays. He could not take part in many important family ceremonies even his sister wedding party. After many years he not only did not enjoy his work but also he became homesick.
In conclusion, this is my deep belief that working more hours not only cause dissatisfaction but also cause people not to relax and fresh. Therefore, I highly suggest that it is better to work in short hours rather than long hours.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-11 | maryka72 | 60 | view |
| 2023-03-07 | Hibahtabbaa | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-27 | kevin1105 | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | Hibahtabbaa | 60 | view |
| 2023-02-23 | can111 | 3 | view |
- the causes of ice age 76
- The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people. 66
- peary's journey 70
- To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors. 70
- about odd sounds 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 40, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
It is unavailable to have a job during a one's life and People spend most o...
^
Line 2, column 28, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'mind substantiating'.
Suggestion: mind substantiating
...ng reasons. The first reason coming to mind to substantiate my standpoint is concerned with this is...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 473, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
..., my cousin worked in a company abroad. Since his work lasted many hours we were not ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, in short, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1659.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 359.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62116991643 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48686776757 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515320334262 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.9888992021 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.0 100.406767564 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0952380952 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.95238095238 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368704563369 0.236089414692 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107359327959 0.076458572812 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0989376748549 0.0737576698707 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234944116657 0.150856017488 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0670684994364 0.0645574589148 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 58.1214874552 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.22 10.9000537634 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.25 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 86.8835125448 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.