Art classes such as painting or drawing are important for children's development, so it should be compulsory in high school. Do you agree or disagree?
Many people say that art subject should be mandatory for high school students as it plays an important role in children’s development. While it is true that those classes such as painting or drawing can be beneficial for the students to some extent, I would argue that it should not compulsory.
To begin with, there are several reasons why art courses contribute positively to the development of children. Firstly, those classes help students relax after getting exhausted due to main classes such as mathematics or literature. This could help the students refresh themselves and refocus on their work. As a result, they could achieve good academic outcomes. Secondly, art skills are also important for children to work as adults. For example, officers need to know how to visualize their ideas with others at workplaces.
However, I do not think high school students all need to take part in art classes. First, most students need to be well prepared for university entrance exams, so they need to focus more on subjects needed for their higher education. If they need to study classes such as painting or drawing, they might have not enough time. Furthermore, some students might find it not interesting to study this subject. According to a survey in a Japanese high school in 2010, only 45% of its students wanted to attend art classes at school.
In conclusion, while art classes bring many benefits to high school students, I disagree with the idea that the students should be forced to study that subject.
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. Why is this the case, and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places? 67
- More and more people want to own famous brands of cars, clothes and other items. What are the reasons for this? Is this a negative or positive trend? 73
- Sending criminals to prison is not the best method of dealing with them Education and job training are better ways to help them Do you agree or disagree 59
- It is impossible to help all people in the world, so governments should only focus onpeople in their own countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- In some countries the number of people choosing to live by themselves is increasing rapidly in recent years Why is this the case Is this a positive or negative development 72
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1274.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0157480315 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6692681113 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57874015748 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 375.3 506.74238477 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.624881458 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1428571429 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6428571429 7.06120827912 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.337234714593 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114460384645 0.084324248473 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0917849244828 0.0667982634062 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229616473037 0.151304729494 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0891635855491 0.056905535591 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.