There is no need to maintain a close relationship with distant relatives. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Families have been considered as phenomenon for human development since the creation of the civilization. The issue of the necessity for constant communication with kins who reside remotedly has always aroused heated disputes. I completely disagree with the above-mentioned opinion and believe the more friends and relatives one possesses the more successful they are.
Many arguments can be found in favour of the view that supporting intimacy in an extended family is vital. For instance, folks could undertake successful collaboration which would be possibly nurtured to a global corporation as Auchan or Ford. Clan associations are oftentimes widespread and famed throughout the world . About 700 blood-related and their partners work for Auchan and manage the assets. Launching an enormous family business is achievable, although the internal relationships should be indestructible.
Apart from that people tend to confide in strangers less than in family members. Therefore individuals fess secrets and request help presuming to encounter support in its entirety from them. In other words, person will less hesitate to ask for aid and consequently acquire it faster. A well-known practice that the first people are called after a car accident are relatives. Building strong ties is crucial because human often depends on others and their decisions and assistance.
All things considered, the obvious conclusion to be drawn is that a prosperous person make every effort to erect solid connections with remote family members. They may become reliable business partners or rescuers during complicated circumstances or play another significant role in someone's life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-09 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 61 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | UNB ADMIRAL | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | UNB ADMIRAL | 71 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | oanhlilies | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | oanhlilies | 56 | view |
- Do you agree that the nuclear technology should be used for constructive purposes?Use your own knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence.Give reasons for your viewpoint. 78
- Nowadays many people use the Internet to get medical advice instead of going to see a doctor Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 89
- The main purpose of public libraries is to provide books and they should not waste their limited resources and space on providing expensive hi tech media such as computer software videos and DVDs To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- Environmental problems such as pollution and climate change affect all the people in the world Although global decisions are made to reduce these problems the solutions are not effective Why are the solutions ineffective How can these problems be solved 89
- The two graphs show the main sources of energy in the USA in the 1980s and the 1990s Write a report for a university lecturer describing the changes which occurred 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 319, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...idespread and famed throughout the world . About 700 blood-related and their partn...
^^
Line 9, column 82, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... strangers less than in family members. Therefore individuals fess secrets and request he...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 134, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to presume' or 'presume'.
Suggestion: to presume; presume
...dividuals fess secrets and request help presuming to encounter support in its entirety fr...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, may, so, therefore, well, apart from, for instance, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1432.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.70517928287 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06405743611 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.713147410359 0.561755894193 127% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.8452417802 49.4020404114 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.4666666667 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7333333333 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.06666666667 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0739769580329 0.244688304435 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0203689876826 0.084324248473 24% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0314408274224 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0435299708301 0.151304729494 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344746351793 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.54 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.47 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.