In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The author argues that it is always beneficial to have discussion among people with contrasting points of view to make a progress. While this may seem plausible in certain cases, there are circumstances that the author may not have considered.
Admittedly, discussion among people with various aspects can sometimes be helpful. Indeed, the opinions from several kinds of people help produce a balanced approach and prevent progress from being excessively biased. For example, many countries have policies to prevent the concentration of powers, namely separation of powers, to consider several aspects and make less biased political decisions. Moreover, discussion among people with only a specific viewpoint may lead to some form of dictatorship, for instance Adolf Hitler, who became a cause of World War II and eventually put the world into a disaster. Accordingly, based on the above examples, the author’s assertion seems plausible to some degree.
Nevertheless, in some situations, discussion among people with different viewpoints can hinder the progress. This is because some people are not likely to cooperate with people with different standpoints and believe that other opinions are wrong or seriously flawed. For instance, it is widely believed that many of the old countries before Korea had been fallen, largely due to wasteful contentions among several parties. People from these parties had little intention to even partially admit the others’ opinions, and these countries eventually became susceptible to invasions of nearby enemies. Also, there are some cases where dictatorship accelerated the development of a country. For instance, Lee Kuan Yew, albeit controversial, greatly influenced the political and economic development of Singapore. It is often said that if he took every other view into consideration, the rapid development of Singapore would not be possible. Hence, there are many cases where the author’s claim isn’t acceptable.
There is a Korean adage saying that having too many sailors leads the boat to a mountain. While there are many situations where discussion among people with several viewpoints help progress to a right direction, in some cases it may be better to have people with similar opinions to make a progress. Therefore, a balanced decision should be made in discussing among people for progress.
- The following appeared in a memo from the owner of a chain of cheese stores located throughout the United States For many years all the stores in our chain have stocked a wide variety of both domestic and imported cheeses Last year however all of the five 69
- The effectiveness of a country s leaders is best measured by examining the well being of that country s citizens Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The issues facing the environment are so complicated that individuals acting alone have no power to affect them Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 71
- The following is a recommendation from the business manager of Monarch Books Since its opening in Collegeville twenty years ago Monarch Books has developed a large customer base due to its reader friendly atmosphere and wide selection of books on all subj 59
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news During this period most of the complaints re 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 120, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'progress'.
Suggestion: progress
...with contrasting points of view to make a progress. While this may seem plausible in certa...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 289, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'progress'.
Suggestion: progress
...ve people with similar opinions to make a progress. Therefore, a balanced decision should ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, hence, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 33.0505617978 45% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2003.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 363.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51790633609 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91319155432 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528925619835 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 629.1 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9093672313 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.277777778 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1666666667 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72222222222 5.21951772744 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210085624204 0.243740707755 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0737392990241 0.0831039109588 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0774798966421 0.0758088955206 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155594457607 0.150359130593 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0410604520168 0.0667264976115 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.1639044944 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.