Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how
they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
Both the reading passage and the lecture are about the effectiveness of cloud seeding to prevent damaging crops due to hailing. The author presents different explanations to show the role of cloud seeding. However, the lecturer casts doubt on these explanations and provides arguments on the effectiveness of cloud seeding.
First of all, the author states that various experiments in the laboratory proves that the cloud seeding technique is effective. He mentions an experiment of silver iodide with cold water vapor. On the other hand, the lecturer says that the experiment is only good in laboratory conditions. Moreover, he argues that silver iodide can prevent any precipitation which can cause risk of drought in some regions. So crops can also damage in different conditions like lack of water.
Secondly, the author points out that evidence proves that some urban areas in Asian regions are using this beneficial technique, so Americans can also apply this technique. However, the lecturer states that this is only suitable in city area where air pollution is very high. Polluted particles favor the conditions for cloud seeding. Therefore, this will not work in unpolluted areas like farm regions.
city area - cities / urban areas
Finally, the author mentions that local study proves that cloud seeding is effective in reducing crop damage due to hail in some of the areas in the United States. While the lecturer says that this study is not convincing. He says that hail away from the treated area but at the same time also affects the neighbouring area. So natural variation in local weather causes the whole region affected.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-16 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 3 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 3 | view |
| 2023-04-16 | rsheth05 | 80 | view |
| 2023-04-09 | prakriti malla | 90 | view |
| 2022-11-07 | GRACE_047 | 73 | view |
- In general people are living longer now Which of the following do you think accounts for this phenomenon Technological improvements Changes to education systems Improvements to our diets Use specific details and examples in your answer 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Is it a good idea for High School Seniors to take a year off before going to college Make sure to use details and examples to illustrate your example 70
- QUALITIES OF A GOOD NEIGHBOR 70
- Independent essay 3
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 2, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: City
...n unpolluted areas like farm regions. city area - cities / urban areas Finally...
^^^^
Line 6, column 11, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ted areas like farm regions. city area - cities / urban areas Finally, the a...
^^
Line 8, column 125, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... in reducing crop damage due to hail in some of the areas in the United States. While the l...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 165, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...some of the areas in the United States. While the lecturer says that this study is no...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1390.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 266.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22556390977 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61387987687 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537593984962 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.8748040748 49.2860985944 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.875 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.625 21.698381199 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5625 7.06452816374 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.066469499175 0.272083759551 24% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0241347844731 0.0996497079465 24% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0369028655626 0.0662205650399 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0364576462806 0.162205337803 22% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402022659321 0.0443174109184 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.3589403974 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.