Interview is not a reliable method of recruitment to what extent do you agree disagree

Essay topics:

Interview is not a reliable method of recruitment to what extent do you agree disagree.

Although, several individuals consider that interview is not an honest method of recruitment of employees. Whereas I strongly support this method to a large extent, I believe that interview is an enormous method to assign employees.
Firstly, in business domain employees play a significant role. Hence they must be checked, owing to checking their skills, knowledge, QI as well as comprehensive power. by the face to face interview it can be diagnosed with their traits.
Additionally, hiring employees is an exhausting task. This is because one can not ascertain authenticity. Moreover, there are plenty of ways to check employees' knowledge such as writing tasks, group discussion but it's an excessive task. Ergo, small companies cannot afford it. For instance, Reliance company has human resources department, which check the employees ability and profound knowledge, whilst other companies may not do this.
in this manner, to conclude the discussion it can be finally said that face to face interview is efficient as well as cheap so as to every company can engage their employees easily and also it's well-engineered method of recruitment.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-09-24 dorae 78 view
2023-09-22 Phuong1810 73 view
2023-07-13 hieu13092006 84 view
2023-07-09 quan12341234 81 view
2023-07-08 autumnisthebest 90 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 63, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...main employees play a significant role. Hence they must be checked, owing to checking...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 169, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: By
...dge, QI as well as comprehensive power. by the face to face interview it can be di...
^^
Line 5, column 147, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...over, there are plenty of ways to check employees knowledge such as writing tasks, group ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 234, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Ergo
...p discussion but its an expensive task. ergo, small companies cannot afford it. For ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 315, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'resources'' or 'resource's'?
Suggestion: resources'; resource's
...or instance, Reliance company has human resources department, which check the employees a...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 353, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...n resources department, which check the employees ability and profound knowledge, whilst ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 110, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...face interview is good as well as cheap so as to every company can hire their employees ...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, hence, if, may, moreover, so, then, thus, well, whereas, as to, for instance, such as, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 41.998997996 36% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 959.0 1615.20841683 59% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 180.0 315.596192385 57% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32777777778 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 4.20363070211 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89795053166 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 176.041082164 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.638888888889 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 286.2 506.74238477 56% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.7329745899 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.1818181818 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3636363636 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0909090909 7.06120827912 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15635651512 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.055858629624 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0812354038554 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106907848433 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106381402647 0.056905535591 187% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 78.4519038076 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.