The charts illustrate the number of people who were affected by four types of noise pollution in day and night in cities and rural areas in 2007
The two bar charts illustrate the population living in rural and urban areas were affected by four different kinds of noise day and night over the year of 2007.
Overall, it is obvious that traffic was the leading cause of noise pollution in both regions all day and night. Besides, the noise in the day was always more intensive than that of the night.
The number of people living in downtowns was effected by traffic was 64 millions in the daytime, nearly doubled that of the countryside with 34 millions during the day. By night, there were 48 millions and 24 millions people inhabit in the metropolis and remote areas respectively, annoyed with the traffic. Meanwhile, the noise from the train affected citizens in both places minimally with less than 10 millions people in daytime and nighttime.
The statistics of urban inhabitants affected by aircraft were 4 millions and 1 million in the day and in night correspondently, whereas those of residents living in remote places were less than 2 millions. While there was no noise pollution regarding the industry in rural areas, people living in urban regions remained to be affected by the noise from the industry with the number of less than 1 million in either day or night.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-11 | ililmaidatuz | 84 | view |
| 2022-01-22 | Pdtrinh | 68 | view |
| 2022-01-22 | Huy Vu | 67 | view |
| 2020-11-30 | nuvuong98 | 67 | view |
| 2020-10-02 | Vicky Phan | 84 | view |
- the first man to walk on the moon said it was a great step for mankind But space travel has made little difference in most people s lives To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- To succeed in a business one needs to know maths To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- Nowadays numerous young people are less happy even though they have become richer healthier and have longevity While there is a number of underlining reasons for this phenomenon some solutions can be taken to tackle this issue There are two primary reason 84
- The table illustrates how much money was donated to developing countries in the period 2006 2010 by US and EU charities to support technological development Overall it is clear that total aid increased during this period US aid was considerably higher tha 56
- The bar chart illustrates the amount of money spent on three different kinds of clothes per person in the US from 1985 to 2005 It is evident that women and men spend on attire more than boys and girls Besides the average expenditure on clothes grew gradua 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, regarding, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1024.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85308056872 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58551547597 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.473933649289 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.914512123 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.0 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.375 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.36735457529 0.215688989381 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.179092582823 0.103423049105 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105224577324 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257121692517 0.15604864568 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105103258124 0.0819641961636 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.