Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The world is changing fast, to get succeed in the future career path, we have to adapt
and change with the times, which require us to add more value to ourselves.
Someone claims that in the workplace, excellent interpersonal skills are more
significant than spending more time in school. Personally speaking, I definitely agree
that the ability to relate well with others has a greater influence on future success.
To begin with, the ability to maintain a good relationship with others means better
teamwork. Nowadays, cooperation gradually becomes an indispensable part of
companies. Usually, we can see a manager assigns the project to a group of people to
handle. In such a working environment, although personal ability is still highly
appreciated, the team always comes first. For that reason, being able to get along well
with the members helps to tackle it. In my experience, once I worked with a group in
the civics class, and at that time, I was poor at English, however, I was able to timely
communicate with my members and take their advice. Eventually, we got through
the project harmoniously and received a good grade, which all owed to the nice social
skills.
What’s more, outstanding interpersonal skills also contribute to winning over
customers. Under the pressure of today’s market, numerous novel companies emerge
in an endless. All enterprises are expected to make more revenue, which means the
more customers you get, the outlook would be better, and if you are able to gain their
trust and like, you will be highly appreciated by your boss. In this case, the employees
who are more able to communicate with customers, understand their needs and have
better attitudes could attract more clients, which would have a larger chance to get a
promotion.
Moreover, most of the occupations do not require the knowledge imparted by
teachers at schools. For instance, it is impossible that all the students, whose major is
anatomy, can take jobs in the science laboratory or be a professor in universities. On
the contrary, most of them have to get jobs that are no related to their professional
knowledge. As a result, working hard in a study for having a high performance does
not make sense while they are working.
In conclusion, studying hard is not always an efficient way to make greater
achievements. Instead, the ability to relate well with others could bring more
benefits to the workforce.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-01 | Verman94 | 71 | view |
| 2023-02-17 | zaid | 73 | view |
| 2022-10-30 | Umme Abiha | 60 | view |
| 2022-10-18 | anman | 70 | view |
| 2022-10-18 | Kalyani_tekade_24 | 85 | view |
- For success in a future job the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school 86
- People should spend money on keeping pet even though they have better ways to use the money 86
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement For success in a future job the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 90
- It is easier to become an educated person now than in the past 87
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People today spend to much time paying attention to the personal lives of celebrities or famous people 82
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 18, column 4, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...et, numerous novel companies emerge in an endless. All enterprises are expected to make m...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, moreover, so, still, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2074.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 404.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13366336634 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83360386291 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566831683168 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 631.8 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8161452073 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.7 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3 5.45110844103 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 30.0 4.53405017921 662% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250480051849 0.236089414692 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0685047130305 0.076458572812 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574963404935 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0559881718487 0.150856017488 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0549733171438 0.0645574589148 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 18, column 4, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...et, numerous novel companies emerge in an endless. All enterprises are expected to make m...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, moreover, so, still, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2074.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 404.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13366336634 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83360386291 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566831683168 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 631.8 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8161452073 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.7 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3 5.45110844103 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 30.0 4.53405017921 662% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250480051849 0.236089414692 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0685047130305 0.076458572812 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574963404935 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0559881718487 0.150856017488 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0549733171438 0.0645574589148 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.