some people nowadays believe that modern technology has made shopping easier while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is true that advances in technology help people can make shopping easier. While others opposite to this idea, I strongly believe that technological development has a major contribution to shopping.
On the one hand, some situations that consumers could not anticipate when online shopping. Regarding the quality of goods, whereas the owners of some stores, especially not well-known brands, claim that they provide high-qualified products, buyers who purchase for the first time could not know whether it is true or not. As a result, there has been a large number of cases reporting about advertised commodities which people have ordered have not had the same both appearance and the quality as they have appeared on computers' screen. Furthermore, law violators could take advantage of online shopping to swindle thousands of dollars of consumers. This is due to the fact that buyers transfer cash in advance but they do not receive their goods afterward.
On the other hand, I would argue that modern technology allows people to make shopping more convenient than ever. Firstly, when some goods made in foreign countries are quite difficult to find in domestic shopping centers, it seems to be simpler by just looking for them in online stores and ordering them. Secondly, those who suffer from some problems such as depression or bedridden do not want to go out, it would handy for them when commodities are delivered directly in front of their doors thanks to the advance in technology. Take Tiki or Shopee as examples. Those are some of the most applications which are widely and commonly used by citizens to online shopping in Vietnam.
In conclusion, while other people do not have a reference for online shopping via modern technological devices, it seems to me that technology makes individual lives much more comfortable in terms of shopping.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-27 | sunflower1190 | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-25 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-07 | nguyen thanh sang | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-19 | hieu13092006 | 11 | view |
| 2023-07-19 | hieu13092006 | 11 | view |
- The table illustrates how much money was donated to developing countries in the period 2006 2010 by US and EU charities to support technological development Overall it is clear that total aid increased during this period US aid was considerably higher tha 56
- The pie charts compare the water usage of various sectors of the economy in Sydney in two years 1997 and 2007 Overall it is clear that the sector which used the highest percentage of water was the food industry The percentage of total water use by the ser
- It is said that the majority of television programmes had better concentrate on educating the young generation about the essence of social aspects While I partly agree with this idea other issues such as advertisement or entertainment cannot be overlooked 89
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 Summerize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The line graph illustrates the amount of money which is received by rice exports from Thailand and Vietnam during the period from 2012 to 2015 It is evident that the prices of rice exports decreased tremendously from 2012 to 2015 Meanwhile the cost remain 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 351, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...rue or not. As a result, there has been a large number of cases reporting about advertised commod...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, regarding, second, secondly, so, well, whereas, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1554.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11184210526 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76218654606 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578947368421 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.8753279831 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.538461538 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3846153846 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.6923076923 7.06120827912 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229429258369 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0805186117242 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0720319974852 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162295368042 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0694653635319 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.