In many countries, a small number of people earn extremely high salaries. Some people believe that this is good for the country, but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
As the gap between the privilege and the under-privilege has been increasingly widened, opinions are divided between whether this trend might lead to social advantages or disadvantages. Since there are two sides to every coin, this essay will give reasons for both views, as well as arguing that there are consequences related to this development.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that individuals with high networths are likely to contribute back to the society. Fundings and charities have been founded to assist financially all sectors of the economy from wealthy philanthropists. Bill Gates had set up Gates Foundation in order to give scholarships to well-rounded but less fortunate students. When it comes to a more indirect assistance, investments from these affluent individuals in technology would advance the humankind as a whole. A prime example of this is Elon Musk, who funded billions of dollars to his own Space X project with the purpose of transporting human to Mars in the near future.
On the flip side, I firmly believe that if governments do not have laws to set limit on one's salaries, societies would be increasingly lack of social mobility, which means the ability to move up or down different social classes. This issue could potentially lead to social unrest, since many, especially people in poverty, do not have a chance to alter their own living conditions. As education is a key to success, it is absolutely unfair when students who comes from poverty-striken families, for instance, got denied by private universities simply because they only accept pupils whose parents have enough power and fundings to buy their ways in.
To conclude, although people who constantly make six-figures and above could be helpful to societies, I am convinced that this phenomenon would lead to unfairness.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-04-08 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
2023-10-16 | BoyClazz | 89 | view |
2023-10-16 | Mollymaul | 84 | view |
2022-08-20 | lucynton | 84 | view |
2022-03-21 | quynh123445 | 84 | view |
- In many countries a small number of people earn extremely high salaries Some people believe that this is good for the country but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level Discuss both these views and give your own opin 78
- In many countries a small number of people earn extremely high salaries Some people believe that this is good for the country but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level Discuss both these views and give your own opin 84
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel s customer service The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 273, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...essay will give reasons for both views, as well as arguing that there are consequences rel...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, well, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1537.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19256756757 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02621060117 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652027027027 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.4438169157 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.727272727 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9090909091 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.90909090909 7.06120827912 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110540879396 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0383630014559 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0305935757919 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0658095182315 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0130228574213 0.056905535591 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.