In some countries, small town-centre shops are going out of business because people tend to drive to large out-of-town stores. As a result, people without cars have limited access to out-of-town stores, and it may result in an increase in the use of cars.
Do you think the disadvantages of this change outweigh its advantages?
In some nations around the globe, people have an inclination of purchasing goods from stores on the outskirts, which puts the small shops in the danger of closure. As a result, the access to those large shops becomes limited to individuals without cars as well as the rise in car usage is predictable due to the need for long distance travel. In this essay, both merits and downsides are dissected to point out the reasons why the trend does more harm than good.
Forcing small sized shops in the town centers to shut down is an unfortunate situation due to some reasons. It can be seen that people who are not in possession of cars to travel for shopping purpose will mostly suffer from the predicament. The time used for traveling to such places can be better utilized for other activities such as work or entertainment. In addition, the trend is for beyond the individual levels. It causes a significant loss for the economy to any city where the increasing bankruptcies of small town-centre shops takes place, which harms the national economy as a whole.
The rising usage of cars due to the people’s demand for long distance travel is also problematic to some extent. Traffic congestion is resulted from the shopping preference, and the toxic waste emitted from car engines is proving detrimental to not only the environment of those places but also to human health.
However, this modification of shopping may encourage them to move out of town to nearby places. Given the fact that modern cities are struggling to face with overpopulation and an ever-growing pressure on house supply and healthcare systems, this change may be considered as a beginning of relieving such pressure.
In conclusion, the trend towards approaching shops located on the outskirts instead of town centers is having several negative impacts. Although it is a motivation for a certain number of people in the city to move out which contributes largely in solving population and other problems, I doubt that this trend could promise any significant outcome.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 56 | view |
| 2023-06-09 | NHU95 | 78 | view |
- The maps below show the changes in the art gallery ground floor in 2015 and present day Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 73
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change we need to find a way to live with it To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people believe that planning for the future is a waste of time because they think that focusing on the present is more important To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The bar chart shows the average size class in primary schools and lower secondary schools in 6 countries compared to the world average in 2006 73
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change we need to find a way to live with it To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, well, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1712.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99125364431 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78255408698 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559766763848 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5925275832 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.285714286 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07142857143 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316097361155 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0987848129911 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590922287789 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161363329169 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0527750436079 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.