Nowadays technology is increasingly being used to monitor what people are saying and doing (for example, through cell phone tracking and security cameras). In many cases, the people being monitored are unaware that this is happening.
In today’s world, the proliferation of technology has made it possible for the government to keep the public under constant surveillance. While some people advocate for the use of camera surveillance, others believe that this can pose certain dangers. From my point of view, I believe that this trend can do more good than harm.
Admittedly, installing the cameras to record the movements of the citizens can cause certain problems. It is obvious that this can be an invasion of the privacy of ordinary citizens. To a greater or lesser extent, people may feel that they have to surrender their rights of privacy with the 24/24 monitoring of the technology. As a result, the cameras will gradually strip law-abiding citizens’ freedom. Moreover, the camera surveillance is not only an infringement of citizens’ rights but it also fuels the fear of crimes in the public. For example, if people notice too many cameras in the neighbourhood, they may think their area is not safe and get the fear from nothing. Some bad people can even tap a line or log the phone of the people illegally. Obviously, technology in this case leads to more problems.
However, there are a myriad of reasons why I support the idea of having camera surveillance. The first thing to notice is that it can assist with evidence gathering. For example, when there is a burglary case, the police can trace the whereabouts of the suspects by watching the tapes from the cameras and then make an arrest. And only when there are images, videos, etc from the cameras will the offenders be prosecuted in the court. Another thing is that the camera surveillance can also act as a deterrent of the would-be criminals. Being aware of their anti-social activities being captured on CCTVs, they will not act out their behaviours. Thus, petty crimes including littering, vandalism, etc can be curtailed and people will be held more accountable for their actions.
In conclusion, while the use of camera surveillance can, to some extent, cause several disadvantages, I believe it will offer a myriad of benefits including assisting the law enforcement officials with evidence gathering and deterring crimes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-02 | monmon12345 | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-29 | Nguyễn Thị Thanh Thảo | 61 | view |
| 2021-06-08 | my220904 | 73 | view |
| 2021-02-17 | iamketpatel | 73 | view |
| 2020-10-20 | mindfulielts | 84 | view |
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit during the same two periods 84
- The information below give details about household income and spending on food and clothes by an average family in one UK city in 2010 and 2013 78
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is considered very important Why might this be the case Is this a positive or negative development 56
- the diagram below shows the recycling process of aluminum cans
- MANY OF THE WORLD S ARE CURRENTLY FACING A SERIOUS HOUSING SHORTAGE WHAT ARE SOME OF THE REASONS FOR THIS SHORTAGE AND WHAT SOLUTIONS CAN YOU SUGGEST 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 22, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
...to more problems. However, there are a myriad of reasons why I support the idea of ha...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, thus, while, another thing, as to, for example, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1819.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 361.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03878116343 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86539624177 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518005540166 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 567.9 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2653731951 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.7368421053 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.84210526316 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252772236348 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0777003276538 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462857751819 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142830326724 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0663361616524 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.