Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
What other measures do you think might be effective?
Growing traffic and pollution now is more serious that demands the best way to solve. Hence, some given idea say increasing the cost of petrol is the best method, whereas there is no doubt that there are better solutions than it. In my opinion, I advocate the second idea that opposes of soaring the petrol’s cost.
On the one hand, I agree that the low price of petrol can activate the requirement to use more means of transportation. Public vehicles are used to transport many people on account of avoiding waste, so sometimes it can disgust passengers for its closeness. However, in case of the low petrol’s cost, users will choose intimate transports instead of common ones, from that, traffic jam and pollution problem occur. Thus increasing the price of petrol may help limit the quantities of vehicles used.
On the other hand, this solution is not a good way to solve the current problem. It will not cause only a domestic problem but also an international issue. Cuz increasing the price of petrol relates to global economic fluctuations and even results in instability on a large scale. For example, in the situation of COVID-19, many Asian countries are forced to soar the price of petrol forwarding to the world, follow it, many commodities also see a considerable rise like a domino effect. This growth has a negative impact on the consumption of residents and company activities. In addition, it also puts pressure on inflation. Thus, to tackle traffic jam and pollution problem, increasing the price of petrol is not a wise choice, instead of this, we can use the alternative materials which is more friendly environmentally and usable. For instance, London and New York use hybrid buses, Paris use buses running by natural gas. Furthermore, conducting more campaigns to encourage residents to use public transport is also necessary. A large number of private vehicles can discharge exhaust fumes ten times more than a bus which transports the same number of passengers.
In conclusion, increasing the price of petrol will inflict a big stumbling block on the global economy, whereas it would not bring an expected result if it was done. There are many better ways than that such as using fresh fuels to replace petrol or adopting public vehicles. In my opinion, to protect the environment and reduce traffic jams does not depend on the price of petrol, it depends on awareness of each other.
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes
- The bar chart shows the percentage of adults who were overweight or obese too fat or much too fat in one country from 1965 to 2015 The pie chart shows the proportion of adults who were overweight obese or severely obese in2015 Summarise the information by 69
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree What other measures do you think might be effective 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 319, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to intimate'
Suggestion: to intimate
...he low petrol’s cost, users will choose intimate transports instead of common ones, from...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 319, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to intimate'.
Suggestion: to intimate
...he low petrol’s cost, users will choose intimate transports instead of common ones, from...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1034, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: Many; Numerous
...use public transport is also necessary. A large number of private vehicles can discharge exhaust ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 421, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... it depends on awareness of each other.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, second, so, thus, whereas, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2011.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 406.0 315.596192385 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95320197044 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73690542658 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556650246305 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 640.8 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.76152304609 252% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8920935261 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.55 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.1 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193288772437 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0598946836003 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0509703921579 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125943620482 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00949552042791 0.056905535591 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.