Nowadays more tasks at home and work are being performed by robots Is this a negative or positive development

Essay topics:

Nowadays more tasks at home and work are being performed by robots. Is this a negative or positive development?

With the advanced optimization of the modern world, the advent of robotic equipment has assisted human in both working and domestic tasks. In my opinion, this would exert both pros and cons to the society.

One of the greatest contributions of robot to human life is that they enable millions of people to work efficiently and enjoy higher quality of life. In fact, thanks to the capability of robotic devices to handle work and resolve information at incredible speed and with accuracy, the burden of workload could be substantially lowered, which means that many workers would proceed quickly and yield more desirable productivities. In addition, people would be able to make advancement and breakthroughs in certain fields like astronomy if these humanoid models are harnessed. They could be sent to the colossal universe as experimental subjects. By this way, hundreds of scientists have ample opportunities to discover and study meteorological phenomena such as weather changes , hence, take proper measures to help human curb natural instabilities. At the same time, as household chores including cooking and cleaning are done by robots, many employees would have more time to relax and enjoy healthy home-cooked meals after a hard-working day at workplaces. This helps them to preclude potential diseases related to the lack of relaxation and consumption of unhygienic food including obesity, diabetes and even cancer.

Notwithstanding all that, i am convinced that there are various risks that human may have to incur as a result of reliance on robotic assistants. From an objective perspective, the completion of domestic chores by robots means that people would take less phyical activities and be highly likely to lead a sedentary lifestyle. This is totally a thorny problem in the fast-paced world where millions of them desperately need a healthy and active body to work efficaciously and prevent illnesses. Without being health-conscious and continuing to rely on these futuristic devices, not only do they have to expend more money to pay for the cost of hospitalization but their longevity is also reduced. Moreover, once such state-of-the-art artificial intelligence is able to perform tasks and assignments more effectively than human, chances are that they will be under the threat of being superseded and made redundant. Consequently, unemployment coupled with social maladies would inevitably accelerate and the future of humanity could be threatened.

In conclusion, although the importance of robots in assisting people with work and household tasks is unimpeachable, i think that people's lives could be dominated as a result of their versatility based on aforementioned arguments.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-09-11 transcendenceeee 73 view
2023-08-04 pwlihnkt 89 view
2023-07-29 quan12341234 61 view
2023-04-17 caigicungduoc 84 view
2023-02-04 hungdung2507 73 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 776, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ogical phenomena such as weather changes , hence, take proper measures to help hum...
^^
Line 5, column 27, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...en cancer. Notwithstanding all that, i am convinced that there are various ris...
^
Line 7, column 118, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...k and household tasks is unimpeachable, i think that peoples lives could be domin...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, may, moreover, so, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2293.0 1615.20841683 142% => OK
No of words: 420.0 315.596192385 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45952380952 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1833976989 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 176.041082164 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607142857143 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 724.5 506.74238477 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.8897891534 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.3125 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.25 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265608799525 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0746649323268 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0416960317222 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149737034858 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.042308391733 0.056905535591 74% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.3 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 143.0 78.4519038076 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.