It is better learn the way people lived in the past through films and video records than written documents.To what extent do you agree or disagree.
Owing to this ultra modern epoch, the movies and documentary clips are more prominent than old books and documents according to this generation however, others are skeptical about the notion. The forthcoming paragraphs educate my personal perception.
To open up with discussion, the myriad of reasons are consitute in the favor of using video clips and films for gaining information about past events. First and foremost, utilization of recordings for getting the knowledge about history is more benefits phenomenon the documents. To justify my point, there is an example, the human 'mind remember the visual more than written text hence when we were watching the movies based on previous life events our brains grap information instantly. Secondly, due to the visual effects such as images, the movies are mostly preferred by the masses owing to the fact that these are less time-consuming henceforward with in short time span peeps get more knowledge and store this in brain for long time.
Adding Further, a couple of more causes are contributing in side of using documentary films for extracting data from the past. First of all, the graphical view of any kind of information more attractive which gain the focus of youngsters To substantiate it there is an epitome, the young ones find graphical representation of data fascinating rather than reading the same content so the movies and documentary films attract them. last on the contrary not the least, in this technosavy era the whole world become digital and the material like video and film are present on the digital platform therefore the availablity of these files become a reason behind the utility of visual recordings.
On the logger head, some gray masses assert that written content for instance old book, researches is only reliable medium for learning about the incidents which were happened in previous decades. They contemplate the movies and the short videos can be manipulative and the wrong representation of the history whereas they only relay on the written documents according to them these researches are subjective and based on real life stories.
All of the above the discussion assertion lead to the conclusion, that visual clips are easiest and interesting mod of getting information about past incidents however, the ancient magazines and books can be helpful to understand the history.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-02 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-09 | Rozy pal | 73 | view |
| 2021-06-17 | Renu_art | 87 | view |
| 2021-06-14 | BHAVANI KESIREDDY | 56 | view |
| 2021-06-13 | baljit12 | 73 | view |
- Many people believe that living a city life offers greater benefits as compared to country side To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- In cities and towns all over the world the high volume of traffic is a problem what are the causes of this and what action can be taken to solve this problem 78
- As computers are being used more and more in education there will be soon no role for teachers in the classroom 73
- It is expected that there will be a higher proportion of the older people than young People in many countries in the future do you think it is positive or negative development 61
- It is better learn the way people lived in the past through films and video records than written documents To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 431, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Last
...ies and documentary films attract them. last on the contrary not the least, in this ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: All the
...tive and based on real life stories. All of the above the discussion assertion lead to ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, whereas, for instance, in short, kind of, such as, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2000.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 382.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23560209424 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76840103616 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549738219895 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 630.0 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.7780319832 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 166.666666667 106.682146367 156% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.8333333333 20.7667163134 153% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0833333333 7.06120827912 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113649577829 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0421402393773 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0251022691879 0.0667982634062 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0590878583997 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0218135580425 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 13.0946893788 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.