Space exploration is a waste of money. Do you agree or disagree?
So far, humanity has been discovering and reaching great result in space. However, there still exist a few notions about spending government budget to detect some kind of entities that called aliens is not necessary as to be used in social program. In my prospective, I totally oppose it and I believe in money which is allocated to cosmic content.
Many beliefs express their mind that not only be waste of expenses and natural resources but it also takes time of researching technologies which are not commonly used in daily life. Their notion is in order to the government can make a full fill budget; these amounts of money need entirely serving communities who have been already contributed in the national asset. Yet not committed in unrealistic project such as space exploration. However, there are a truth that many people still stabilize their normal life by their own financial efforts. Therefore, I completely reject any idea about just only use money and experiments to enhance terrestrial forms- life.
There is no doubt that the universe is obvious mystery where there is such much myriad thing that needs to be discovering. Both social welfare and finding new ones are principal missions. Moreover, on the way of developing, it also can bring a huge success in divers domains; this theory has been proved for a long history of human being. Technologies breaking, promoting production or creating lots of new careers demanding intensive and extensive research are for some instances. Nonetheless, the most being concern is the investigations for a substitution of the earth in a few next centuries. Accordingly, we will obtain repercussions if we refuse to invest this domain.
In conclusion, the science of cosmos is and will become one of the most important in near future. So, without any doubt that considerable government budget is not misspending. Although, the risky is still there, I suppose that we should continue what we have done and the next generation will get benefits which is potential at present day.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-14 | nobitaa | 89 | view |
| 2024-05-14 | Sandeep USA | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-26 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-23 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-12 | Manideep Macherla | 84 | view |
- Topic some people think that it is more effective for students to study in groups while others believe that it is better for them to study alone Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Space exploration is a waste of money Do you agree or disagree 89
- People say that reading for pleasure helps people to develop imagination and better language skills than watching TV To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The chart below shows the number of visitors to a local cinema according to age in 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- It is better to learn the way people lived in the past through films and video records than written documents To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 89, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... waste of expenses and natural resources but it also takes time of researching te...
^^
Line 4, column 341, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fits which is potential at present day.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, so, still, therefore, as to, i suppose, in conclusion, kind of, no doubt, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1702.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06547619048 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85013401244 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627976190476 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1337728501 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.117647059 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7647058824 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.29411764706 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0615919924309 0.244688304435 25% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0190584329662 0.084324248473 23% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0268042662821 0.0667982634062 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0351325457949 0.151304729494 23% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0356136907201 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.