Some people think that newspapers are the best way to learn about current events. However, others believe that they can learn news better through other media. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Many people consider that access to information through the media such as social networking sites, online newspapers are better than a classic approach to the news from print papers. I agree that accessing online journalism would be the best option compared to traditional newspapers.
On the one hand, there are many reasons why some people believe newspapers are the best way to learn about current affairs. Firstly, printed newspapers will provide accurate and reliable sources. The detail will be checked carefully before reaching the consumers. In addition, printed newspapers are often published by large, well-known newsprint companies, so the accuracy and reliability are right, but there is a minor inconvenience that the transmission speed for information is slow. Secondly, traditional newspapers created an easy access environment without distraction. The commercials are printed separately to help readers not get distracted, while sometimes the advertisement appears rampant or sudden or even hidden inside the article when reading online. Lastly, the traditional newspaper can help store information. This makes it easier for consumers when they need to find information through collecting, sorting, and filtering, but it also depends on the reader's hobby of collecting or not.
However, I believe modern forms of media are better for a number of reasons. Firstly, modern media helps readers access information quickly. Everyone is living in the age of technology, so it is normal for them to have a smartphone no matter what age they are. With just a few clicks of the screen, they can access a great source of knowledge. Although there are conflicting opinions about the accuracy and reliability of the resource, there are a lot of large printed newspapers companies that have developed to keep up with the era of online newspapers and they still maintain the trust of consumers. For example, in the past, Thanh Nien began with printed newspapers and most of their consumers were middle-aged people, but now they are internet-based newspapers and expanded their audience to teenagers. Secondly, digital newspapers created a new approach to knowledge by watching report videos right on the website. This way can help readers reduce the eyestrain and shorten their reading time. Lastly, digital newspapers can help protect the environment. A lot of paper manufacturing companies have been cut down trees to produce papers. This may lead to deforestation. In contrast, publishing information for online newspapers will help reduce the number of trees cut down.
In conclusion, because of the development of technology, print newspapers are no longer popular and many people have chosen to read online newspapers thanks to their smartphones. I think that online journalisms are still the best way to read newspapers, not because of the speed, but they overhaul the limitations of traditional journalism.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-21 | thaokim2003 | 89 | view |
| 2024-05-21 | thaokim2003 | 78 | view |
| 2021-11-29 | ashkan zaheri | 95 | view |
| 2021-11-10 | eyraen | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-27 | CDTSON | 67 | view |
- The charts below show changes in the proportion of energy produced from different resources in a country in 1985 and 2003 67
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in New Port city center from 2003 to 2012 81
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams like football However others think that taking part in individual sports like tennis or swimming is better Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
- In many countries the number of animals and plants is declining Why is this the case How to solve this issue 73
- The graph below shows coffee production in four different countries from 1990 to 2010 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 972, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'readers'' or 'reader's'?
Suggestion: readers'; reader's
...d filtering, but it also depends on the readers hobby of collecting or not. However,...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, still, well, while, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2472.0 1615.20841683 153% => OK
No of words: 454.0 315.596192385 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4449339207 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61598047577 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97066590285 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517621145374 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 756.0 506.74238477 149% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.6733585633 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9166666667 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.70833333333 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 8.67935871743 207% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205659844452 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0582214425469 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637589518928 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12782048679 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0165927532361 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.