In their advertising, businesses nowadays usually emphasise that their products are new in some way.
Why is this? Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
Introduction: With the development of the society, in their promotion, companies regularly fuss on the advertisement of the goods are new side. In my view, it is a negative development and the reasons behind this tendency will be outlined in the following essay.
Body 1: In general, there are two main causes of advertising a number of their products are new way is to hit the curiosity and the interest of customers in new goods. Businesses who are very understanding the consumer psychology so that hitting the curiosity will help them to increase the sales of products. As a result, many new products could be bought by humans who are always curious to find and own what they don’t know and don’t have so. For instance, when Apple which is one of the most reputable technology companies in the world shows their novel products had been set in line to purchase by people who love technological goods. In recent, increasing people who spend an amount of money on many things which are only unique and not everyone has. Despite in fact it is nothing new or changed so why the concern innovates products regularly, they find it so beautiful or attractive so they would buy it. In addition, goods that are unique and fresh will be liked and stimulate buyers. For example, Coca Cola, Pepsi which is one of the most famous soft drink brands in the world, these establishments usually change their products template like they give famous people as brands representatives.
Body2: There are exceptions, it also brings a negative development, the trade loses the value of products and reputation of their company so the quality will be decreased and become a mass because it is nothing special out of a flashy look Because of forgetting that quality is more important than shell because it is momentary interest in the newness of the consumers and might disappear at any time so if the goods do not have a good quality, purchasers will not choose to use. Failing to complete the trust of customers in brands because of the continuous release of new products, it is difficult to guarantee quality. For instance, people could hear a number of stories about Chinese smartphones. Chinese smartphone is known for beautiful designs and cheap prices but it is regularly said that causes many accidents due to fire and explosion by the news. I believe that businesses just focus on quality instead of producing a number of new goods in a short time.
Conclusion: In conclusion, the reasons which are used by businesses like a way to hit their sales and increase competition among brands. It is necessary but it brings a negative development for the companies because it loses the value of products.
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this 73
- In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasise that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 184, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... customers in new goods. Businesses who are very understanding the consumer psychology so that hitting...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, in general, as a result, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 13.1623246493 198% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2239.0 1615.20841683 139% => OK
No of words: 461.0 315.596192385 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8568329718 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63367139033 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78051678925 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498915401302 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 709.2 506.74238477 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 87.2258731179 49.4020404114 177% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.705882353 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1176470588 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.29411764706 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229024710496 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0702064657486 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608665207908 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152148720922 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396306047122 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 50.2224549098 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.