In recent years sports stars have become increasingly famous and wealthy. For some this is a benefit, raising the profile of sports, but for others it is a negative influence. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It is undeniable that professional players in sport are receiving stupendous attention from the public as well as revenue streams. A school of thought believe that this phenomenon would bring about numerous positive effects to the sport industry, while others said that it would only cause detriment to the field. Personally, I believe the merits are offset by the drawbacks since money could distort people view point about sport and being famous often come with a great pressure.
The increasing in the income would certainly be a great encouragement for the sportsman or sportswoman, especially those who start from unfortunate situation. This would lead to the enthusiasms in professional sport players, and thus improving their performance. For example, in order to meet the expectation of the viewers and the club owner, Cristian Ronaldo has devoted most of his youth into training, and thus became one of the best soccer player in the world. Therefore, this trend would support the athletes both financially and mentally, and audiences could enjoy more entertaining games.
On the other hand, this situation could put the pro-players under great strains. Fans tend to expect their idols to maintain well-performance on the field, however, it is unlikely that any sportsperson could do that. Although it is a commonplace, sometimes people get disappointed and angry at the lost, leading to the hateful comments on the internet about the players. This might have negative effects on the emotion of those who received it, and thus affect the performance of them. Furthermore, with the hefty income, players might be distracted and overindulge themselves. In the longer term, this would gradually drag them down in their career path. As the result, many young talents are being wasted by the vanity.
In conclusion, whilst the professional athletes might feel incentive with the raising salary, I reckon that being popular and affluent could be pernicious to the career trajectory.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-16 | viethung123 | 84 | view |
| 2023-01-16 | viethung123 | 84 | view |
| 2023-01-16 | viethung123 | 84 | view |
| 2021-12-31 | akorn99 | 84 | view |
| 2021-11-17 | akorn99 | 73 | view |
- Some countries import a large amount of food from others To what extent is this a positive or negative 84
- More and more city workers are deciding to live in the country and travel into work every day The result is increased traffic congestion and damage to the environment What measures do you think could be taken to encourage people not to travel such long di 78
- The flow chart shows trampling the negative effect of tourists walking in the countryside for the environment Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features 65
- In recent years sports stars have become increasingly famous and wealthy For some this is a benefit raising the profile of sports but for others it is a negative influence Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- The bar chart shows the percentage of people in the United Kingdom per age group without any qualifications 82
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, i reckon, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1678.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31012658228 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85104629734 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607594936709 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9192158065 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.866666667 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0666666667 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143397451782 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0440155533522 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0329551961191 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0801996154029 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0436942956954 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, i reckon, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1678.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31012658228 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85104629734 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607594936709 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9192158065 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.866666667 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0666666667 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143397451782 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0440155533522 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0329551961191 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0801996154029 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0436942956954 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.