You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The charts show average levels of participation in education and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore.
The bar chart illustrates the average number of males and females attended school according to the years shown up. While the pie charts present the several levels of education achieved by adults in Singapore in 2000 and 2010.
Mainly, there was an a heap increase in the number throughout the years, for both genders, that were spent on education. It can also be seen that the quantity for males was somewhat higher over the period shown.
As can be shown from the bar chart, in 2000, males attended school for an average of 8.9 years, which rose substantially to just under 12 years in 2010. In contrast, the number of years females attended school in 2000 was only 8. This attitude remained unchanged until 2008, and then rose to 8.9 years in 2010.
However, after 10 years, the level of education people in Singapore achieved was significantly higher, with nearly 33% pursue tertiary education, and only 2% leaving after finishing primary school thus the increase wasn’t enough for the development of education .
- Take a look at the question and the graph You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The line graph shows visits to and from the UK from 1979 to 1999 and the bar graph shows the most popular countries visited by UK residents in 1999 Summarize the info 61
- The graph shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features making comparisons where relevant 70
- The graph below provides information about three different types of music in England 67
- the pursuit of profit and economic growth prioritize addressing social and environmental issues 56
- The charts below give information on UK spending habits for books bought over the internet Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 19, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'an' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: an; a
...re in 2000 and 2010. Mainly, there was an a heap increase in the number throughout ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 262, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... enough for the development of education .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, then, thus, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 848.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93023255814 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.491537349 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593023255814 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.3856199322 43.030603864 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203638471343 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0956739043398 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107309346502 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13184174373 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0973638090764 0.0819641961636 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.