In their advertising, businesses nowadays usually emphasise that their products are new in some way.
Why is this? Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
With the increasingly competitive market, businesses have to constantly employ new methods to attract customers. Therefore, through the advertising channel, they often emphasize their products to be the lastest, or the advanced ones. This move might be due to many reasons, but it is positive nevertheless.
The reasons include the boost of sales and the reinforcement of the company’s image. In order to attract customers’ attention, it might be wise to know their simple psychology of always being curious to know or to possess new items. As a result, if the products receive a new appearance, it might help improve sales greatly. Additionally, if a firm could produce novel products, it could reflect an active research and development aspect, thus/consequently gaining trust in the reputation/quality and the image of a company.
The approach might be advantageous or not, depending on the subject in question. To the environment, this move tends to improve sales and production, thus leading to more waste and harming the wildlife and plants. However, to the businesses, this seems to be one of the most beneficial developments, as it helps grow the company and brings more financial gain.
On the consumer’s side, if the items are not truly new, this could lead to bad purchase decision and harm their monetary prospect. In the opposite situation, the appearance of new items on the market repeatedly may entich customers to make impulsive purchases, which is also detrimental to their bank account balance.
- In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasise that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 56
- Some people think scientific research should focus on solving world health problems Others think that there are more important issues Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- The diagrams below show how floods happen in a village and give two solutions to deal with them Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparation where relevant 78
- The chart shows the percentage of people who accessed news from 4 sources from 1995 and projection to 2025 78
- Some people think that zoos are cruel and should be closed down Others however believe that zoos can be useful in protecting wild animals Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1283.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 243.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27983539095 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18346738592 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.61316872428 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 394.2 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.745877917 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.916666667 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.41666666667 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183396403024 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061163464069 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.043918244584 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109974182067 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0533451772825 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.