The chart below shows the changing that took place in three different areas of crime in Newport city centre from 2003-2012
The line graph illustrates three different types of crime, namely burglary, car theft, robbery in Newport city centre which had changes on the level between 2003 and 2012.
It is noticeable that, the rate of burglary was the highest until 2006 then it fell significantly and its place replaced by car theft. However, the level of robbery remained fairly constant.
To start with, it was 3400 incidences of burglary in 2003 and it reached a peak in 2004 with nearly 3700 accidents. In the next four years it registered a downward trend and reached a minimum approximately 1200 incidents in 2008. However, in 2009 it grew by virtually 3000 accidents and remained almost stable until 2012.
On the other hand, car theft maintained the same level during the first three years from 2003 to 2005 yet, it declined to around 2000 incidences in 2006, then there was a fluctuation until 2009. The figure showed about 2700 accidents in the last given year. Finally, robbery stayed almost unchanged from 2003-2012.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-10 | Abhishek Neupane | 56 | view |
| 2022-03-15 | Кабулбек Кабулязов | 78 | view |
| 2022-03-15 | Мадина | 84 | view |
| 2021-12-26 | ngchi_3603 | view | |
| 2021-12-25 | ngchi_3603 | 78 | view |
- The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego County California and the rest of the world
- The chart below shows the changing that took place in three different areas of crime in Newport city centre from 2003 2012 84
- The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego California and the rest of the word 78
- The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego California and the rest of the world
- The chart below shows the annual number of rentals and sales in various formats of films from a particular store between 2002 and 2011 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, then, to start with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 839.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96449704142 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5265925749 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639053254438 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.1320708092 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.2222222222 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7777777778 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.44444444444 5.23603664747 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218835619302 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0788951917204 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0962243777505 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134332856927 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117109380467 0.0819641961636 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, then, to start with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 839.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96449704142 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5265925749 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639053254438 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.1320708092 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.2222222222 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7777777778 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.44444444444 5.23603664747 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218835619302 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0788951917204 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0962243777505 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134332856927 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117109380467 0.0819641961636 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.