Keeping animals in the zoo is the best way to protect wild animals. Do you agree or disagree?
In order to protect wild animals, it is argued that putting them in zoos is the best way. Personally, this statement is not true.
On the one hand, zoo animals may enjoy certain benefits. Firstly, in most zoos captive animals are not vulnerable to malnutrition or starvation. Animals raised in captive environment are fed by zoo caretakers on the daily basis and more importantly, there is no serious concern over the shortage of food for animals in the zoo. As a result, the animals are unlikely to suffer from undernourishment or hunger. Secondly, zoo animals are less likely to die from diseases. Thanks to medical aid from veterinarians, an animal’s ailments can be treated effectively, thus increasing their chance of survival.
Despite these advantages, raising animals in captivity brings about greater drawbacks. Confining animals to a human-made environment is to great extent responsible for unhealthy progeny. Obviously, caged animals are only allowed to mate with a small number of individuals, producing offspring with increased vulnerability to diseases. Furthermore, wild animals, once separated from their familiar environment, could be dead from depression. In fact, imprisoned animals are prone to anxiety or fear due to change in weather or home. Consequently, such aversive mental states often result in giving up eating with the result that death is to be expected. Based on this analysis, the better way to protect wild animals is raising them in nature reserves where they are free to breed with their chosen partners and can be guarded against health problems because of observation of vets.
In conclusion, it might be advantageous for animals to inhabit in human-made environment. However, they cannot grow as healthily as wild animals in nature reserves.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-17 | Kha Linh | 61 | view |
| 2024-12-17 | Kha Linh | 61 | view |
| 2024-12-14 | Sang Sang Sang | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-13 | Sang Sang Sang | 78 | view |
| 2024-12-08 | ankushgurumaa | 78 | view |
- People living in the 21st century have a better quality of life than the previous centuries To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some believe that money for education should mainly be spent on better computers while others believe it would be better spent on teachers Discuss both views and give your own opinion 95
- Some people say that too much time and resources are spent on the protection of wild animals and birds To what extent do you agree or disagree 90
- Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it must be stopped Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- The advancement of internet technology means people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how people in other places live To what extent do you agree or disagree 93
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 243, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...d animals are only allowed to mate with a small number of individuals, producing offspring with i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, may, second, secondly, so, thus, in conclusion, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1513.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36524822695 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0193884987 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617021276596 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.8764702111 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5882352941 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05882352941 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345626453621 0.244688304435 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114781299052 0.084324248473 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0694994023523 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214970512088 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041817524039 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.57 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.