In the future all cars, buses and trucks will be driverless. The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers. Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages.
It is argued that bus, car and truck drivers will no longer be needed in the future, therefore travellers are predicted to be the only people commuting inside these traffics. Although this trend may offer some advantages, I believe that they are eclipsed by demerits.
To begin with, I think an increase in automatic transportation would reduce a large number of employment opportunities. Particularly, there are dozens of people making a living by driving and many of them are their family’s breadwinner, so if they are replaced by technology, they may have difficulties looking for a new job. Take a train driver as an example, his employment involves working with engines or controlling a vehicle, then he would have few chances to find a job requiring these skills when almost all vehicles are driverless. As a consequence, a great number of drivers is predicted to be unemployed at a later time.
However, some people still claim that the benefits of non-driver transports outweigh those drawbacks since they are safer than vehicles controlled by humans. They may think that there will be no drunk or drowsy driver who brings about accidents. But, I personally believe that people could not ensure the safety of an automatic transport. To be specific, preprogrammed softwares and artificial intelligence could not react to unexpected situations as well as humans. For example, a few years ago, a self-driving Tesla car collided with a tree and caused the death of two passengers because it failed to navigate a turn. Meanwhile, drivers are trained to be willing to face many scenarios. Clearly, transportation controlled by humans may have a higher level of safety compared to driverless vehicles.
In conclusion, although there are some advantages to self-driving traffic, I am of the view that these benefits can not overshadow the disadvantages including a decrease in job chances and a lower level of safety.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-10 | brew | 73 | view |
| 2024-08-09 | brew | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-26 | aliceali | 56 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | butterflyluo | 73 | view |
- The charts below show the internet use in different purposes in Australia in 2010 2011 and the percentage by users Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity 61
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal Some people however think that other types of progress are equally important for a country Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 67
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think this is a positive or negative development 73
- People in some countries owning a home rather than renting one is considered very important Why might this be the case Is this a positive or negative development 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 78, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...n automatic transportation would reduce a large number of employment opportunities. Particularly,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 317, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'automatic transport'.
Suggestion: automatic transport
...t people could not ensure the safety of an automatic transport. To be specific, preprogrammed software...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 216, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ob chances and a lower level of safety.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, may, so, still, then, therefore, well, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1623.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18530351438 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08150235914 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584664536741 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6994636018 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.928571429 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3571428571 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271749659438 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0810769664291 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0770345427592 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15264833598 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.072556131547 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.