Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research,business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or valuable to be shared freely.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
Although sharing knowledge in science, business and other academic fields is thought to be good and essential, some people believe there is an amount of valuable information that should not be shared freely. This essay will discuss both views before reaching the conclusion that each statement could be right but need considering.
On the one hand, information in academic areas should be shared to reduce the gap among countries around the world. Particularly, if knowledge about science, technology and so on is spread, undeveloped and developing countries could have more chances to approach it or to apply it for their nations. For example, the fifth-generation technology was deployed worldwide in 2019, which could provide higher speed and greater capacity for a large number of residents in the world wherever they live. Moreover, sharing academic information would help to improve the quality of education. To be specific, many schools may update new shared knowledge, then include it in their training program. Take the medical area as an example, there are a great number of universities around the world starting researching Coronavirus after the outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic. As a result, students could be provided state of the art methods to catch up with the world.
On the other hand, there is some information which should not be shared due to its importance to an organisation. In other words, if this information is spread around, it can affect the competitiveness of the company. For instance, a technology company has to keep some research which is valuable to attract customers and increase profits. Furthermore, sometimes, some information should be kept as secrets to save the peace of not only a country but also the whole world. In more detail, knowledge involving lethal weapons may have detrimental effects on life if it is passed on to crimes or organisations using it for war purposes. Nuclear weapons are a prime example, because it is a real menace to world peace when all countries know how to produce and own this type of weapons. Therefore, people and governments should consider sharing knowledge about academic areas.
In conclusion, both views have valid points, however, I strongly believe that each statement has several benefits. Sharing information could help to keep many countries closer and increase the level of education, while some of it could be unfavourable, even dangerous if being shared without restriction. That is the reason why people should think carefully before spreading this knowledge.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 437, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...e higher speed and greater capacity for a large number of residents in the world wherever they li...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 903, Rule ID: STATE_OF_THE_ART[1]
Message: Did you mean 'state-of-the-art'?
Suggestion: state-of-the-art
...As a result, students could be provided state of the art methods to catch up with the world. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2157.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 409.0 315.596192385 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27383863081 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89630655338 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535452322738 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 664.2 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8333323426 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.526315789 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5263157895 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.21052631579 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360443043611 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110308213325 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100899082208 0.0667982634062 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249066310018 0.151304729494 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0851574961976 0.056905535591 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.