Some companies sponsor sport and sports stars as a way to advertise themselves. Some people think it is good, while others think there are disadvantages. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Promoting products or services through KOLs and celebrities has never been less of a trend, and companies and brands are now turning to sports and athletes to achieve their advertising goals. While some people may believe that this is advantageous, I argue that the drawbacks outweigh the benefits.
Firstly, paying a good deal for sports stars may counteract and negatively affect their performance. This is extremely true in team sports, such as football. For example, when a brand awards the winning team as well as a player who scores in the match, there are countless circumstances when one single player succumbs to temptation of the prize and become selfish, as a result, one will try to net a goal without passing to or cooperating with team members. However, if the person is not in a favourable spot, he or she will lose the control of the ball to or even injured by opponents.
Secondly, commercializing sports blur the real meaning of it and offend genuine athletes. Realizing that they could make a bargain by becoming a sports player, a good few people decided to jump in the industry just because of money, therefore reducing chances for authentic sportsmen who pursuit sports as a passion. These half-hearted athletes may abandon their career after earning a certain amount of money or fame, resulting in disappointment from fans towards the whole field. Furthermore, money also leads to a win-at-all-costs attitude, encouraging bribery or the use of illegal substances such as performance-enhancing dopes.
In conclusion, there may be adherents of sponsoring sports stars, I oppose to this trend because it devastate the fairness in sport as well as counteract on players performances.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-20 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-20 | Phuong1810 | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-21 | pwlihnkt | 89 | view |
| 2022-08-01 | MichaelP | 61 | view |
| 2022-07-23 | eyraen | 67 | view |
- Housing areas with taller buildings or building houses on a wider area of land What solution is better 89
- People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems Give your opinion 84
- Some people say that outdoor activities bring benefits to children s development rather than computer games To what extent do you agree disagree 84
- Cyclists and car drivers today share the same road cause some problems What are the problems What can be done do to reduce these problems 84
- The charts show the proportion of holidaymakers of one region staying in different types of accommodation in three different years
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 145, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...they could make a bargain by becoming a sports player, a good few people decided to ju...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 543, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...so leads to a win-at-all-costs attitude, encouraging bribery or the use of illega...
^^
Line 4, column 101, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'devastates'?
Suggestion: devastates
...tars, I oppose to this trend because it devastate the fairness in sport as well as counte...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1436.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1654676259 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12239332824 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636690647482 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.2450996161 49.4020404114 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.545454545 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2727272727 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.0 7.06120827912 212% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160238901638 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0580523051988 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0551803886106 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102039343836 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421624061376 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.