Although there is a lot of translation software available, learning a language could still be advantageous. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this day and age, a lot of translation software is available. However, it is believed that learning a language could still have a plethora of advantages. From my perspective, I completely agree with this opinion, since it help us in many aspects of life.
On the one hand, learning a language may help people to widen their knowledge. When people learn a language of a country, they have to find and read books, watch documentaries about that country in the language that they are learning. By this way, they have a chance to know more about their culture and their customs. For instance, my brother-in-law learnt Japanese in order to study in Japan 5 years ago. By learning Japanese, he knew that reading magazines and comics is one of the Japanese’s hobbies. Moreover, people learning a new language may avoid culture shock, since they have no difficulty in language barriers.
On the other hand, people may have an effective communication by learning a new language. As they can speak that language fluently, know more about the usage of structures and words than other people, they feel more confident to have a conversation with foreigners. For example, my friend have learnt Korean by herself and she had a chance to visit Korea 2 years ago. During her vacation, she can easily enter a conversation with Korean and make new friends. As a result, she had an unforgettable tour, which a translation software cannot provide.
In conclusion, a plethora of translation software cannot replace the necessity of learning a language, since it has a lot of benefits in social life. In spite of the expansion of translation software, people should not rely on it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-09 | hieu13092006 | 89 | view |
| 2023-03-06 | tieuquynh | 89 | view |
| 2022-11-05 | nvtrung309 | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-26 | Charles Le | 89 | view |
| 2022-07-28 | Hanhcass | 89 | view |
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone call in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002 Summarise the information by selecting a reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone call in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 67
- Although there is a lot of translation software available learning a language could still be advantageous To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- To succeed in business one needs to learn and know math To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, moreover, so, still, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1387.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90106007067 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88864016983 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519434628975 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.76152304609 252% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.889118003 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.6875 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6875 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174333808922 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0652183054469 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0601587220553 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126761587615 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.058909301457 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, moreover, so, still, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1387.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90106007067 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88864016983 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519434628975 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.76152304609 252% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.889118003 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.6875 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6875 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174333808922 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0652183054469 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0601587220553 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126761587615 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.058909301457 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.