Although innovations such as video, computers, and the Internet seem to offer schools improved methods for instructing students, these technologies all too often distract from real learning.
All too often we hear about the phrases about whether technology is blessings for us or not. Despite the unspeakable benefits of innovations of new technology throughout our daily lives, they have some negative impacts in our ways of life which also can not be denied. As the prompt stated the dilemma about instructing students through technology such as video, computers, and the Internet has benefitted the students in their learning process but somehow, they have diverted the students from the actual learning. I mostly agree with the statement and will argue throughout the disquisition about why I have chosen this stance.
To begin with, when teachers allow their students to have the gadgets on their own and instruct the teaching materials through them, it gives student the full control over the computers, tabs, or phones which eventually may distract them from the learning. Because, the students have the control over devices, they can go wherever they want. For example, when a student is attending his or her class via online such as Zoom or Google Meet, instead of concentrating on the class, he or she may browse social media such Facebook or Instagram, or playing games on another apps. It is not a big deal to do so.
Furthermore, there is a chance of distractions from the explicit contents which are available online. Because, they do not have the control over what they are going to see. As we know about advertising company what they do online. For example, if a student browsing for contents to complete his or her homework but unfortunately he or she has seen a explicit content on their screen which may deviate his or her focus on finishing the homework rather they might go for experiencing those things.
However, new innovations have broken the previous instructing analog ways and made the methods more convenient and communicative for both students and teachers. For instance, when a student may face any kind of difficulties in performing his or her required tasks, he or she easily may communicate with the teachers instantly and could get the proper guidelines for completing the assignment efficiently and effectively.
To recapitulate, despite the very few advantages for using the technologies in instructing students, the vast disadvantages which mainly harm the real learning may exceed the benefits. Therefore, it is needed to reconsider the amount of gadgets using and how much students may get the permission to use them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-28 | qsdzlbnwtpzecdeugi | 33 | view |
| 2024-02-19 | Zahid6400 | 75 | view |
| 2024-01-19 | rimpiG | 54 | view |
| 2023-11-09 | Feiyang Wang | 79 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | weonalaz | 58 | view |
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any ot 55
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 66
- Although innovations such as video computers and the Internet seem to offer schools improved methods for instructing students these technologies all too often distract from real learning 70
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 102, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...it contents which are available online. Because, they do not have the control over what...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 173, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ontrol over what they are going to see. As we know about advertising company what ...
^^
Line 3, column 348, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...rk but unfortunately he or she has seen a explicit content on their screen which ...
^
Line 5, column 259, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...der the amount of gadgets using and how much students may get the permission to use ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, for example, for instance, kind of, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2065.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 407.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07371007371 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83407538537 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535626535627 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 627.3 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.2454488951 60.3974514979 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.0625 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4375 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1875 5.21951772744 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228481119699 0.243740707755 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0713103837026 0.0831039109588 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661119682106 0.0758088955206 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124916235347 0.150359130593 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0474782308714 0.0667264976115 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 102, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...it contents which are available online. Because, they do not have the control over what...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 173, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ontrol over what they are going to see. As we know about advertising company what ...
^^
Line 3, column 348, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...rk but unfortunately he or she has seen a explicit content on their screen which ...
^
Line 5, column 259, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...der the amount of gadgets using and how much students may get the permission to use ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, for example, for instance, kind of, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2065.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 407.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07371007371 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83407538537 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535626535627 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 627.3 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.2454488951 60.3974514979 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.0625 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4375 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1875 5.21951772744 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228481119699 0.243740707755 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0713103837026 0.0831039109588 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661119682106 0.0758088955206 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124916235347 0.150359130593 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0474782308714 0.0667264976115 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.